WEBVTT

00:01.500 --> 00:18.500
Good afternoon from Curry
Castle. It's the Big 4 O
birthday show. I'm Adam Curry.

00:18.500 --> 00:25.500
Today is Friday, September 3rd,
2004, and it was 40 years ago
today that the nurse said

00:25.500 --> 00:30.500
in the Audentine Hospital,
ma'am, if you don't push, we're
never going to get this kid out.

00:30.500 --> 00:37.500
And that was me, born on this
day in 1964. You listen to the
source code. So good morning,

00:37.500 --> 00:42.500
good afternoon, good evening,
wherever you happen to be
listening to the show. But of
course,

00:42.500 --> 00:50.500
it's probably on a commute from
point A to point B. This is the
only spot on your portable MP3

00:50.500 --> 00:58.500
player device that has a
playlist where users and
developers party together. So
I've just been

00:58.500 --> 01:01.500
saying at home for my birthday
today, nothing too special.

01:03.000 --> 01:08.000
Birthdays actually pretty big
deal in the Netherlands.
Typically the birthday boy or
girl,

01:08.000 --> 01:11.000
hold on, we just took this off
for a second. The birthday boy
or girl will get,

01:12.000 --> 01:17.000
they'll have a special chair for
them all decorated in the
morning and presents are given

01:17.000 --> 01:25.000
in the morning and breakfast.
We're not that Dutch per se, but
since I'm home anyway, kind of
chilling out.

01:26.000 --> 01:37.000
Yeah, just had a nice easy wake
up call for my 40th, which is
good, a nice way to ease into
the

01:39.000 --> 01:44.000
the park where life apparently
starts where everything begins
at 40. Excuse me.

01:44.000 --> 01:48.000
My buddy from the radio show,
one of my two colleagues,
Alexander stopped by

01:49.000 --> 01:55.000
to another typical Dutch
tradition and he actually drove
for quite a distance to come
here and he

01:55.000 --> 02:00.000
just stopped by just to have a
cup of coffee and chat and he
gave me the most awesome,
awesome

02:00.000 --> 02:05.000
birthday gift. When we moved to
the Netherlands,

02:04.500 --> 02:11.500
about over four years ago, I
already had Curry.com, which I
was using quite happily.

02:11.500 --> 02:16.500
And well, Curry.nl had been
taken a long time ago by Hines,
probably.

02:16.500 --> 02:19.500
And I guess they have as much
right to it as I do.

02:19.500 --> 02:24.500
But Adam Curry.nl had been
hijacked at the time.

02:24.500 --> 02:26.500
I was like, yeah, whatever, I've
got Curry.com.

02:26.500 --> 02:29.500
I was never really planning on
doing a Dutch weblog, which by
now I've been doing it.

02:29.500 --> 02:30.500
Keeping in touch with a blog.

02:33.000 --> 02:37.000
it just became live.curry.com
slash Dutch and you know what
people find it anyway, it's no
big deal.

02:38.000 --> 02:42.000
But what Alex and I did is he
went through the time and the
trouble and this is what makes

02:42.000 --> 02:48.000
us such a great gift to reclaim
my domain name for me and it
already links to my to my Dutch

02:48.000 --> 02:54.000
weblog. So that's and he also
promises going to renew every
single year. So it's the gift
that keeps

02:54.000 --> 03:00.000
on giving really. Adamcurry.nl
that's my Dutch weblog and still
posting on it though a little

03:00.000 --> 03:08.000
less frequent as I used to and I
was really doing the radio show
in Holland and you know just

03:08.000 --> 03:13.000
keeping up with everybody. Now
I'm focusing a lot more of my
time and attention on the

03:13.000 --> 03:19.000
English weblog on curry.com. And
I think I mentioned it yesterday
just so you know that you can
get to

03:19.000 --> 03:26.000
the archive of all of the source
code shows by going to
dailysourcecode.com that's
dailysourcecode.com

03:26.000 --> 03:33.000
all three words written
together. And the RSS feed if
you want to subscribe to it we
are pumping out

03:34.500 --> 03:42.500
So which means we have
enclosures and those enclosures
can be parsed by different
aggregators,

03:42.500 --> 03:45.500
which will pull out the MP3
files for you.

03:45.500 --> 03:47.500
And if you feel like it, you can
use the iPodder.

03:47.500 --> 03:55.500
Now available for Windows, for
Macintosh, for Linux, also for
Pocket PC.

03:55.500 --> 04:00.500
And I just got some really good
news that there is a version
that works with Windows Media

04:00.500 --> 04:03.500
Player. It hasn't been released
yet.

04:03.500 --> 04:06.500
This is done by Erwin.

04:06.500 --> 04:11.500
And he based his code on the
iPodder for Windows that works
with iTunes.

04:11.500 --> 04:16.500
Now what's great about having a
release for Windows, the worst
with Windows Media Player

04:16.500 --> 04:21.500
9 is that Windows Media Player 9
already has all kinds of
different connections with

04:21.500 --> 04:23.500
different media devices.

04:23.500 --> 04:27.500
So when we talk about the iPod
platform, of course, we're only
talking about all devices

04:27.500 --> 04:30.500
that are portable to play MP3
files.

04:30.500 --> 04:32.500
So this is a big breakthrough.

04:32.500 --> 04:35.500
And what I had hoped is,
remember I told you that someone
had...

04:36.000 --> 04:38.000
claimed iPodder on SourceForge.

04:38.000 --> 04:39.000
Now it's going to set up a
central resource.

04:39.000 --> 04:42.000
Now if I don't see it appeared
this afternoon

04:42.000 --> 04:45.000
or by tomorrow morning, then I
am going to start up

04:45.000 --> 04:48.000
a central spot, which will
probably be SourceForge.

04:48.000 --> 04:50.000
Just so we can aggregate all of
these different scripts

04:50.000 --> 04:53.000
and have it in one spot and then
have us

04:53.000 --> 04:58.000
get it probably find out if we
get a good URL to point to it.

04:58.000 --> 05:01.000
But we really have to start
pulling this together.

05:01.000 --> 05:03.000
Because it wouldn't be amazing
if you could

05:03.000 --> 05:05.000
create a little toolkit.

05:05.000 --> 05:07.000
Here's a thought for you.

05:07.000 --> 05:10.000
If we create a little toolkit,
let's say

05:10.000 --> 05:16.000
I want to publish a program and
I already have the software

05:16.000 --> 05:17.000
to do it.

05:17.000 --> 05:18.000
But what I want is I want to
make sure

05:18.000 --> 05:20.000
that my built-in audience who
may not have already

05:20.000 --> 05:25.000
been exposed to iPodder, that
they can basically just

05:25.000 --> 05:30.000
click on a standardized link,
subscribe with iPodder,

05:30.000 --> 05:31.000
whatever.

05:31.000 --> 05:35.000
This link then will, if
necessary, download a version

05:35.000 --> 05:37.000
appropriate for your system.

05:37.500 --> 05:40.500
including the feed that you just
subscribed that you just looked
at.

05:40.500 --> 05:45.500
So they'll have one or however
feeds that particular program
producer wants to put in there.

05:45.500 --> 05:48.500
And if you already have an
iPodder, then of course it would
hopefully only

05:49.500 --> 05:51.500
subscribe you to to that feed.

05:52.500 --> 05:56.500
I know it sounds trivial, but
these are the things we still
haven't gotten working on
weblog.

05:56.500 --> 05:59.500
So I think we have quite a way
to go on that one.

06:01.500 --> 06:02.500
Lawrence Lee sent me a note.

06:03.500 --> 06:10.500
And he too was interested in the
iPod platform and working with
iPodder.

06:11.500 --> 06:16.500
And he said, well, you know,
there's a couple of different
angles we should we could
approach this from.

06:17.500 --> 06:23.500
At the rate we're going, we're
going to wind up with many, many
different scripts for many
different devices.

06:24.500 --> 06:28.500
Wouldn't it be simpler to create
one centralized aggregating
resource?

06:28.500 --> 06:30.500
And that's where that's where I
say, I don't know.

06:30.500 --> 06:38.500
I don't think so. You know, I
think that this stuff has to be
so decentralized, not just
because of the load because
there is death.

06:39.000 --> 06:43.000
definitely load when you're
doing any type of central
aggregation.

06:43.000 --> 06:47.000
But also for control, there
should be no control, there
should be no one in the middle

06:47.000 --> 06:52.000
to grab control or for even to
be the possibility of having
some kind of control.

06:52.000 --> 06:55.000
I just don't think that's a good
idea.

06:55.000 --> 07:00.000
But certainly something that we
need to look into before we blow
it off entirely or at least

07:00.000 --> 07:04.000
that I think we should look into
different ways of approaching
this problem.

07:04.000 --> 07:09.000
But as I said, I'm really happy
with Erwin's Wendell Media and
Windows Media Player Number

07:09.000 --> 07:10.000
9.

07:10.000 --> 07:11.000
Hi Anya.

07:11.000 --> 07:12.000
What is this?

07:12.000 --> 07:13.000
Huh?

07:13.000 --> 07:15.000
From the close to fans.

07:15.000 --> 07:16.000
Oh, I'd play that.

07:16.000 --> 07:17.000
Yeah.

07:17.000 --> 07:18.000
Yeah, nigga.

07:18.000 --> 07:19.000
Okay.

07:19.000 --> 07:20.000
It was off the safe.

07:20.000 --> 07:21.000
Yeah.

07:21.000 --> 07:22.000
Okay, don't kill.

07:22.000 --> 07:24.000
I was on your…

07:24.000 --> 07:27.000
She helps out of here.

07:27.000 --> 07:32.000
And so when I dropped off a nice
gift for me, a nice bottle of
something.

07:33.000 --> 07:34.000
Okay.

07:34.000 --> 07:35.000
Very nice.

07:35.000 --> 07:36.000
Thank you.

07:36.000 --> 07:38.000
Thank you very much.

07:38.000 --> 07:39.000
Great.

07:39.000 --> 07:40.000
So this…

07:40.500 --> 07:45.500
the Windows Media Player 9. I
think that's a big win right
there because it's basically,

07:45.500 --> 07:49.500
you download the script, it
brings the stuff in, you have a
feeds file, you drop anything

07:49.500 --> 07:54.500
into that feeds file you want,
and Windows Media Player 9 can
already sync up with a whole
bunch

07:54.500 --> 08:03.500
of different portable devices,
and probably they have the, it's
set up with vendors of MP3
players

08:03.500 --> 08:10.500
so that they can, I guess, get
something into an update of
Windows Media Player or
something

08:10.500 --> 08:14.500
that's downloadable so it syncs
up. I mean, that would only make
sense that they're working hard

08:14.500 --> 08:23.500
on that, so we can piggyback on
all of that work. I also got a
request to discuss the legal
issues,

08:23.500 --> 08:32.500
specifically of playing music
during one of these programs,
and I don't think I want to go
there,

08:32.500 --> 08:38.500
I don't think I want to get into
that discussion on this program,
or I don't really want to get

08:38.500 --> 08:41.500
into it at all, because it's,
it's, it's,

08:42.000 --> 08:45.000
such a big discussion that will
really bog down the work we're
doing.

08:45.000 --> 08:50.000
In the case of source code,
first of all, the rules are a
little bit different in Belgium

08:50.000 --> 08:53.000
and in the Netherlands and in
the EU in general.

08:53.000 --> 08:59.000
So, you know, there's, I'm not
too worried about the RIAA
clamping down on me because
quite frankly,

08:59.000 --> 09:03.000
I'm outside of the jurisdiction
and reach and there's no
partnership agreements
whatsoever

09:03.000 --> 09:05.000
on that front.

09:05.000 --> 09:11.000
Or at least as far as I know,
there's no agreements on that
front.

09:11.000 --> 09:20.000
But also, you know, most of the
stuff I'm playing, I've played
so many times throughout my
radio career.

09:20.000 --> 09:27.000
I've made definite money for
people along the way and I don't
think that anyone who owns

09:27.000 --> 09:32.000
the copyrights on these pieces
of music, which I know most of
them personally or I've met

09:32.000 --> 09:35.000
at least once, they'll make a
big deal out of it.

09:35.000 --> 09:41.000
And, you know, copyright laws
can't be intended so that when
we're working on development

09:41.000 --> 09:43.000
and research, that's exactly
what we're doing here that we
can't...

09:43.500 --> 09:50.500
you stuff that's out there to do
this type of research. Now if I
was trying to make money on this
in some other way,

09:51.500 --> 09:55.500
that might be open for
discussion and I think that it's
something that should be
discussed, not right now.

09:55.500 --> 09:58.500
You know, now we're in R&D mode,
we're digging down and trying to
get

09:59.500 --> 10:03.500
trying to get everything
working. And I think we're
having a lot of success. The

10:04.500 --> 10:06.500
the Dutch Telegraph,

10:07.500 --> 10:13.500
as I said yesterday pointed to
the inquire article and to the
iPod or scripts both the Mac and
the Windows version.

10:13.500 --> 10:19.500
And traffic has been amazing. I
think a lot of feedback here
from people in the Netherlands.

10:20.500 --> 10:22.500
Let me just see

10:25.500 --> 10:29.500
I guess, Lawrence Lee, who had
the, I think I messed it up
there.

10:29.500 --> 10:35.500
Lawrence Lee had the legal
question, and it was Andrew
Davy, who had the question of

10:35.500 --> 10:39.500
centralizing the aggregation.

10:39.500 --> 10:44.500
Or perhaps, here he says
something interesting here.

10:44.500 --> 10:47.500
He believes the development of
community should work together
to create an application that

10:47.500 --> 10:53.500
handles the nitty gritty of RSS
parsing and provides a simple
extensibility model for other

10:53.500 --> 10:54.500
people to plug into.

10:54.500 --> 10:58.500
Okay, so he's saying, why don't
we build an aggregator?

10:58.500 --> 11:01.500
And that may make sense, but
again, you're going to get into,
I think you're going to

11:01.500 --> 11:05.500
get into Holy Wars of what
language do we use?

11:05.500 --> 11:09.500
And I think it's relatively
simple enough that, hey, if I
could create one of these things

11:09.500 --> 11:11.500
to work, then almost anybody
can.

11:11.500 --> 11:15.500
And all we need is a couple of
good versions that connect with
all the right bits, and

11:15.500 --> 11:17.500
I think will be good to go.

11:17.500 --> 11:19.500
So anyway, I sent everyone a
note back.

11:19.500 --> 11:25.500
He was going to talk to Peter
who created the original iPodder
for Windows, who asked

11:27.000 --> 11:28.000
because he used some of his
code,

11:29.000 --> 11:32.000
well actually what he did is he
removed the Apple script,

11:32.000 --> 11:35.000
or the iTunes code and put in
the Windows Media Player 9 code.

11:35.000 --> 11:38.000
So already we're working modular
across the board.

11:38.000 --> 11:40.000
Very, very fun to watch.

11:41.000 --> 11:44.000
Something that I watched on my
computer yesterday

11:44.000 --> 11:47.000
was the most recent Apple
keynote

11:47.000 --> 11:50.000
from the Apple Expo in Paris.

11:53.000 --> 11:55.000
Well, although he can't help it,

11:55.000 --> 12:00.000
it was very disappointing that
Phil Schiller did the keynote

12:00.000 --> 12:03.000
because I'm a big Steve Jobs
keynote fan.

12:03.000 --> 12:05.000
I love watching the way he
presents,

12:05.000 --> 12:07.000
and how he handles the stage.

12:07.000 --> 12:09.000
And it's really a joy to watch
him do that.

12:09.000 --> 12:11.000
Phil Schiller actually did a
pretty good job.

12:11.000 --> 12:15.000
And it was fun to see how a
format of a show like that,

12:15.000 --> 12:17.000
because you know exactly what's
gonna happen,

12:17.000 --> 12:17.000
right?

12:17.000 --> 12:18.000
He's gonna talk up some stuff in
the beginning

12:18.000 --> 12:20.000
and run through some of the
stuff you saw

12:20.000 --> 12:23.000
at the previous developer
conference keynote.

12:23.000 --> 12:25.000
It brings three vendors on
stage,

12:25.000 --> 12:27.000
one of the internal guys,
they'll sit, you know,

12:27.000 --> 12:29.000
stand behind their Mac show off
their...

12:28.500 --> 12:35.500
stuff, then you get some other
wind up, some stuff in the
middle, and then one more thing,

12:35.500 --> 12:39.500
then we need the box to rise out
of the stage. It has the new
iMac on it, which by the

12:39.500 --> 12:45.500
way does look very sweet. So
that format was already there.
That was cool, and Phil just

12:45.500 --> 12:51.500
kind of fit right in there. But
even though he did a different,
amazing job, he still doesn't

12:51.500 --> 12:57.500
have that presence that Steve
has. And of course, that's
because Steve Jobs was a

12:58.500 --> 13:05.500
operated on, and he was at home
recuperating. Phil Schiller said
during the keynote that Steve

13:05.500 --> 13:10.500
would be back in September. So I
guess he's just about ready to
start now. Although the one
thing,

13:12.500 --> 13:17.500
and these types of things they
say about CEOs who are out of
action,

13:19.500 --> 13:25.500
I think hopefully most people
care right off. How is Jobs
doing? Is he okay? Is he

13:25.500 --> 13:35.500
and your house is health?
Unfortunately, the investment
community.

13:30.000 --> 13:34.000
meaning Wall Street is paranoid
about this type of stuff and
they really want to know

13:34.000 --> 13:40.000
how is he doing? Is he coming
back? And it's important to them
for their investment strategies

13:40.000 --> 13:46.000
and because it will, it's
already affecting the content,
no matter what.

13:46.000 --> 13:54.000
When when Schiller did is I chat
AV demonstration, if it all
possible, that's where I would
have

13:54.000 --> 13:59.000
said, hey, you know, why don't
you I chat Steve at home where
he's recuperating? I mean,

13:59.000 --> 14:03.000
if he's going to start in a
couple of days or a couple of
weeks, then presumably he would

14:03.000 --> 14:08.000
be fit enough to do that. Of
course, I didn't choose to do
that and that it only makes me

14:08.000 --> 14:17.000
hope that Steve Jobs is
recovering very well and either
didn't think of it or it was too

14:17.000 --> 14:21.000
late for him or whatever, but
that if he really is a fully
recovered or almost there, that

14:21.000 --> 14:26.000
would have been great. Just from
a show perspective, you know,
again, all I want is the best
for

14:26.000 --> 14:31.000
anyone certainly when it comes
to health. So, let's see.

14:31.500 --> 14:36.500
There was a little more in-depth
demonstration of Safari RSS.

14:36.500 --> 14:43.500
And I remember commenting, I
think on my web blog about the
unveiling of Safari RSS.

14:43.500 --> 14:48.500
I thought jobs,
uncharacteristically, didn't do
a very good job of explaining
what you

14:48.500 --> 14:55.500
can use this for and what Safari
RSS will give you, what kind of
benefits it will give you.

14:56.500 --> 15:01.500
Phil Schiller did a much, much
better job.

15:01.500 --> 15:04.500
And it looks like these guys
really put together something
excellent.

15:04.500 --> 15:08.500
It's basically, it's a built-in
aggregator, but not just an
aggregator where you can

15:08.500 --> 15:09.500
subscribe to stuff.

15:09.500 --> 15:13.500
You can easily make up sets of
aggregated content.

15:13.500 --> 15:18.500
So you can say, here's all of my
feeds that I'm subscribed to.

15:18.500 --> 15:21.500
And they do that with bookmarks,
by the way.

15:21.500 --> 15:24.500
I'm going to make a collection,
so I want all my computer feeds
here.

15:24.500 --> 15:30.500
And I think you can mix and
match and slice and dice those
collections almost on the fly
and create a new one.

15:30.500 --> 15:32.500
So you can just be looking at
subsets.

15:33.000 --> 15:35.000
that's of your already
pre-aggregated data.

15:35.000 --> 15:36.000
And then when you have that,

15:36.000 --> 15:39.000
you can also search through that
aggregated

15:39.000 --> 15:41.000
through those aggregated feeds.

15:41.000 --> 15:43.000
And you keep changing your view.

15:43.000 --> 15:44.000
So not really getting results,

15:44.000 --> 15:47.000
but you're getting different
feeds.

15:47.000 --> 15:48.000
And there's even a slider bar

15:48.000 --> 15:51.000
so you can say, okay, how much
content do I wanna read

15:51.000 --> 15:56.000
underneath each entry in this
aggregator

15:57.000 --> 15:59.000
so it can be one line of text

15:59.000 --> 16:01.000
or the entire text or anything
in between.

16:01.000 --> 16:03.000
And it's just, it blew me away.

16:03.000 --> 16:06.000
It looks like a really, really
good aggregator.

16:06.000 --> 16:07.000
Now, of course, the questions
are,

16:07.000 --> 16:10.000
will it support enclosures?

16:11.000 --> 16:14.000
And here comes the big plea, hey
guys,

16:14.000 --> 16:16.000
could you please connect it to
iTunes?

16:16.000 --> 16:17.000
Wouldn't that be great?

16:17.000 --> 16:20.000
It would certainly make this,

16:20.000 --> 16:23.000
well, we're trying to achieve a
lot more robust

16:23.000 --> 16:25.000
and much easier for people to
use.

16:25.000 --> 16:29.000
And it could open up an entire
market.

16:29.000 --> 16:32.000
So that's a question that
remains to be seen,

16:32.000 --> 16:34.000
but I'm very bullish on Safari.

16:34.500 --> 16:39.500
because they've got to have a
database under the hood too.

16:39.500 --> 16:41.500
It's very excited about that.

16:41.500 --> 16:44.500
Of course, that'll be at least
another,

16:44.500 --> 16:48.500
probably another seven to eight
months before that comes out,

16:48.500 --> 16:52.500
maybe even longer, they're
talking about second half of
2005.

16:54.000 --> 16:56.000
So remaining with Apple, oh,
here's something I noticed.

16:56.000 --> 16:58.000
It's just kind of cool.

16:58.000 --> 17:04.000
Here's something, you know, if
you have an iPod, and I'm sure
that most of these earphones

17:04.000 --> 17:08.000
are built in a similar fashion,
the iPod actually, I'm going to
take one out now because

17:08.000 --> 17:14.000
I'm wearing them, listening to
the monitor of the recording.

17:14.000 --> 17:18.000
The two ear plugs are different.

17:18.000 --> 17:23.000
It even has one has an L on a
right, indicating L on R,
indicating left or right ear to

17:23.000 --> 17:26.000
be inserted into.

17:26.000 --> 17:30.000
But they're not symmetrical.

17:30.000 --> 17:33.000
So they are built in a certain
way that you can actually put it
in.

17:33.000 --> 17:38.000
It goes underneath, kind of, I'm
sure that has a name, I should
Google that.

17:38.000 --> 17:40.000
What's that little thing on the
inside of you?

17:40.000 --> 17:42.000
The little inner low, I guess.

17:42.000 --> 17:46.000
And then it kind of just hangs
behind there and just kind of
sticks in there and it's a real

17:46.000 --> 17:47.000
comfortable fit.

17:47.000 --> 17:53.000
I noticed something the other
day when I was in a group of
different people.

17:53.000 --> 17:55.000
And remember, I'm 40 now, so you
may...

17:55.500 --> 18:01.500
not to have the same results
with people you know. But I,
this is great. I found out that

18:01.500 --> 18:09.500
people who have had a facelift
can't wear these earphones
because a part of it, and of
course

18:09.500 --> 18:15.500
has to be a serious facelift. So
what they do is they pull the
skin of the face back towards

18:15.500 --> 18:20.500
the ear. You'll see people who
had a couple facelift, you'll
see their ears are kind of on
the

18:20.500 --> 18:24.500
back of their head. But in the
process of doing that, it kind
of tightens everything in that

18:24.500 --> 18:32.500
that inner load part just
becomes straight. It doesn't
really have a little piece
sticking

18:32.500 --> 18:37.500
out where you can clip an iPod
earphone behind. So just thought
that was interesting, a

18:37.500 --> 18:48.500
little faxoid. And of course
that would open up a market for
facelifted earplugs. And one

18:48.500 --> 18:56.500
other thing looking at this
entire keynote is that Apple
along with...

18:57.000 --> 19:02.000
most other companies that are in
the business of MP3 players, all
they talk about is music.

19:02.000 --> 19:04.000
That's all they talk about.

19:04.000 --> 19:08.000
The iPod is for music, it's for
bouncing, it's for, you know,
look at the commercials.

19:08.000 --> 19:13.000
It's, you know, listen to
different music, share music
between different computers,
stream

19:13.000 --> 19:16.000
music, buy music from the IT
music store.

19:16.000 --> 19:21.000
I'm like, wow, you know, this
is, why are they driving it all
towards that?

19:21.000 --> 19:25.000
I haven't heard anything about
different uses of audio.

19:25.000 --> 19:26.000
And there are so many different
uses.

19:26.000 --> 19:31.000
It seems like we're not only
have we forgotten what you can
do with audio because we're

19:31.000 --> 19:33.000
so video-minded I presume.

19:33.000 --> 19:36.000
Just like we were rediscovering
the written word and web logs
and how powerful it can be

19:36.000 --> 19:42.000
and what you can achieve just by
writing something, we're going
to go, I predict that we're

19:42.000 --> 19:48.000
going to have a kind of
reinvention of the wheel with
video and audio, of course, will

19:48.000 --> 19:51.000
probably happen a little bit
sooner just because it's easier.

19:51.000 --> 19:56.000
You know, we're able to transfer
these large audio files and
video files, you know, it's,

19:56.000 --> 19:58.000
I think they're still a little
bit too big right now for the...

19:58.500 --> 20:03.500
hard to space and processing
power well processing power is
okay but bandwidth certainly is
a problem.

20:03.500 --> 20:11.500
So anyway they're just not
talking about it and you know
that I find that kind of weird
because we're

20:11.500 --> 20:16.500
you know we're going to go
through people creating you know
the old fashioned radio shows
where people

20:16.500 --> 20:22.500
are acting stuff out and and
interviews and there's just so
much more but not a word
everyone's talking

20:22.500 --> 20:28.500
about music as if you know
that's the only thing we can do
with these devices so go figure.

20:29.500 --> 20:35.500
I had hoped at least somewhere
that people would pick up on
audio books because you know
I've

20:35.500 --> 20:41.500
been talking about audio books
Dave Winer has been talking
about audio books. A lot of
people are

20:42.500 --> 20:49.500
using these I think that there's
a definite market here. I fact I
saw that a quote by the CEO of

20:49.500 --> 20:54.500
audible.com the other set of the
other day saying that you know
they're doing fantastic. I'm
sure

20:54.500 --> 20:59.500
it's his job to say that but he
the quote read pretty sincere.
Now I've been

21:00.000 --> 21:06.000
to review an audiobook or two
here on Source Code. And I
thought I was going to step away
from it,

21:06.000 --> 21:12.000
but then I thought, no, it's
such a great part of the content
of the iPod platform that isn't

21:12.000 --> 21:16.000
being talked about. I think we
should do it. And there are lots
of people who are listening to

21:17.000 --> 21:24.000
to audiobooks. And I reviewed a
couple of them, but here's
something cool that happened.

21:24.000 --> 21:31.000
Through Track Back, I received a
comment on one of my audiobook
reviews from Eric Rice.

21:32.000 --> 21:40.000
I'm going to pull up his page
here because what he doesn't
have is, hmm, I'll see.

21:41.000 --> 21:44.000
Oh, he has a little spinning
beach ball of death. He's giving
a second.

21:46.000 --> 21:53.000
So anyway, he's using, I think
he's using audio blog.com to
post his audio blogs.

21:53.000 --> 21:58.000
And I never used it, but from
what I understand with audio
blog.com, you best be set it up

21:58.000 --> 22:01.000
and then you dial in with a
special phone.

22:01.500 --> 22:06.500
number or use do a select a
phone code once you've dialed
in. You record your audio blog,

22:06.500 --> 22:11.500
you press star or hang up, and
then it automatically posts it
onto your web blog. Well, so
here's

22:11.500 --> 22:17.500
what happened. Eric is listening
to Source Code in the car. He
hears something about audio
books.

22:17.500 --> 22:23.500
He wants to respond to it. He
calls up his audio blog.com
account and leaves the following
message.

22:27.000 --> 22:29.000
There comes, hold on.

22:31.500 --> 22:34.500
everybody is there from air
christ dot com

22:34.500 --> 22:37.500
on a very warm and beautiful
when they hear in california

22:37.500 --> 22:41.500
uh... today's audio blog is
actually for adam curry i a
uh...

22:41.500 --> 22:44.500
like adam i drive a tremendous
amount

22:44.500 --> 22:45.500
during the week

22:45.500 --> 22:49.500
and something we probably put
similar miles on our cars and
i'm looking to a

22:49.500 --> 22:51.500
daily source code mp3

22:51.500 --> 22:55.500
it's a kind of content that i
can take with me a little bit
different than some

22:55.500 --> 22:58.500
audio blog for audio blog more
streaming the more momentary

22:58.500 --> 23:01.500
uh... probably takes more work
to go ahead and load it up on
your iPods and it

23:01.500 --> 23:04.500
does actually fit it play and

23:04.500 --> 23:06.500
figure out that the amount of
the business with me so

23:06.500 --> 23:09.500
uh... he's talking about audio
book and he talking about

23:09.500 --> 23:14.500
reviews of audio book and i have
to pipe in here because i
recently purchased

23:14.500 --> 23:19.500
at another audio book and i'm
starting to do to join the audio
book bandwagon

23:19.500 --> 23:22.500
primarily because of how much
time i spend in the car

23:22.500 --> 23:24.500
uh... like everybody else got an
iPod

23:24.500 --> 23:28.500
and i am hopelessly addicted to
one book

23:28.500 --> 23:30.500
and i think it's because of the

23:30.500 --> 23:31.500
the reader

23:31.500 --> 23:32.500
the guy who narrates the story

23:33.000 --> 23:37.000
The book is something that
probably most technical folks
like.

23:37.000 --> 23:42.000
It's a cyberpunk thriller called
Snowcrash by Neil Stevenson.

23:42.000 --> 23:45.000
I have the unabridged version
and it's 18 hours long.

23:45.000 --> 23:50.000
I'll tell you, there is nothing
cooler than listening to
Snowcrash, especially if you
like the novel.

23:50.000 --> 23:54.000
And driving, especially at night
or when it's rainy and nasty.

23:54.000 --> 23:57.000
I've actually video blogged this
before.

23:57.000 --> 23:59.000
It's a book that really just
draws you in.

23:59.000 --> 24:02.000
Jonathan Davis does a phenomenal
job of reading this.

24:02.000 --> 24:11.000
So I actually went on iTunes to
search for more audio books that
are read by Jonathan Davis.

24:11.000 --> 24:13.000
Now I know Jonathan Davis is a
part of our work.

24:13.000 --> 24:16.000
There's just a little snippet
from Eric Rice.

24:16.000 --> 24:18.000
So here's what I find
phenomenal.

24:18.000 --> 24:22.000
So he wasn't necessarily
responding to a book that I was
talking about.

24:22.000 --> 24:27.000
But he was responding to audio
to my program about audio books.

24:27.000 --> 24:29.000
And he gave me an idea.

24:29.000 --> 24:35.000
Let me tell you, Snowcrash by
Neil Stevenson was the
inspiration for Metaverse.

24:34.500 --> 24:38.500
which was a domain name that I
registered in the 80s.

24:38.500 --> 24:40.500
It was a very early 90s.

24:40.500 --> 24:44.500
And I was right after MTV.com,
that's right, Metaverse.com.

24:44.500 --> 24:46.500
And I actually had an agreement
with Neil Stevenson

24:46.500 --> 24:49.500
that, you know, he said, you can
use the domain name, no problem,

24:49.500 --> 24:52.500
as long as you don't merchandise
the name, Metaverse for T-shirts

24:52.500 --> 24:54.500
or books or films, whatever.

24:54.500 --> 24:56.500
We had a little contract and it
was perfect.

24:56.500 --> 24:58.500
And he actually thought it was
quite an honor that, you know,

24:58.500 --> 25:01.500
he was this place in cyberspace
called The Metaverse.

25:01.500 --> 25:05.500
If you've read Snowcrash, then
you know that The Metaverse is
basically,

25:05.500 --> 25:07.500
it's basically the net.

25:07.500 --> 25:10.500
It's the internet in this book
and everyone can jack into it.

25:10.500 --> 25:12.500
But you really jack in 3D.

25:12.500 --> 25:18.500
So Snowcrash has such, you know,
I love that book.

25:18.500 --> 25:19.500
I really did.

25:19.500 --> 25:23.500
It gave me a whole different
view on where we might be going
in the future.

25:23.500 --> 25:27.500
So I thought, hey, you know, if
there's an audio book version

25:27.500 --> 25:31.500
and Eric Rice, who apparently
really appreciates the speaker,

25:31.500 --> 25:34.500
you know, then this is a book
that I want to have.

25:34.500 --> 25:36.500
And yeah, I think I can...

25:36.000 --> 25:41.000
and divvy up 18 or 19 hours
worth of listening to Snowcrash.
I'm sure, yeah, I mean do it.

25:43.000 --> 25:48.000
So the real interesting thing
here is this feedback loop that
was created.

25:48.000 --> 25:52.000
Let me talk about what happened
first, and I'll get back to the
feedback loop.

25:52.000 --> 25:59.000
So check how the flow of money
went on this. So Eric says,
check out Snowcrash.

25:59.000 --> 26:05.000
I go to audible.com, and I'm
like, you know, I hope they have
it. Type it in Snowcrash.

26:05.000 --> 26:10.000
You know, Stevenson, yeah, on a
bridge version. It's there. And
then I see a banner up at the
top.

26:10.000 --> 26:15.000
And believe me, I don't think
I've ever purchased anything off
clicking on a banner.

26:15.000 --> 26:20.000
But it was for John Stewart's
new book, which audio book of
his book. I guess he has a book,

26:20.000 --> 26:26.000
but this is the audio book
version, which he goes through
the history of America and
democracy.

26:27.000 --> 26:32.000
And see, the Snowcrash book was
$34.95. And I thought that was a
lot of money for it. But you
know,

26:32.000 --> 26:38.000
of course it's 7, 18 hours
worth. But still, you know, I
think I'm in.

26:37.500 --> 26:39.500
That's a lot of money for one
book.

26:39.500 --> 26:43.500
John Stewart's book, on the
other hand, was $7.95.

26:43.500 --> 26:47.500
I'm not sure how audible does
this, but apparently it's like
each time you buy a book, then

26:47.500 --> 26:52.500
you get a book credit, and then
it's subtracted from your next
purchase.

26:52.500 --> 26:56.500
So I had a book credit from my
previous purchase, and what I
thought was really nice is that
credit

26:56.500 --> 27:00.500
was applied towards the $34.95
and not the $7.95.

27:00.500 --> 27:04.500
So I basically got the John
Stewart book and Snow Crash for
$7.95, and I feel really good

27:04.500 --> 27:08.500
about myself, and they're both
in great quality with great
speakers.

27:08.500 --> 27:12.500
And the John Stewart stuff, I
haven't finished it all, so I
don't want to do a review until

27:12.500 --> 27:15.500
I've heard all of it.

27:15.500 --> 27:16.500
But it is phenomenal.

27:16.500 --> 27:17.500
And it's exactly what I was
talking about.

27:17.500 --> 27:24.500
He has different speakers,
different voices, he has sound
effects, he has, it's a real
radio

27:24.500 --> 27:31.500
show almost with people acting
out parts, and it's just so well
put together.

27:31.500 --> 27:34.500
And he also has a very nice
speaking voice for audio.

27:34.500 --> 27:38.500
So if the audiobook business
doesn't...

27:39.000 --> 27:45.000
see this and see how simply it
goes, you know, than they're
crazy. And I think that we can
be a part

27:45.000 --> 27:52.000
of that ecosystem one way or the
other. See, there was everything
else about the John Stewart
book.

27:52.000 --> 27:55.000
Oh yeah, I do want to say
something about John Stewart
book. I want to say that,

27:58.000 --> 28:04.000
unfortunately, still can't seem
to get a steady RSS feed of
daily shows. But I know John
pretty

28:04.000 --> 28:10.000
well because he started out, as
many of you may know, at MTV, he
had a show called the John
Stewart

28:10.000 --> 28:17.000
show. And that was on about six
or six or eight months before I
left MTV to go and start my
company.

28:18.000 --> 28:24.000
And we hung out at the very
first MTV V-chows. And he's a
really nice guy. And he was just
at the

28:24.000 --> 28:30.000
wrong spot at MTV. You know,
they were so overprotective
because you couldn't piss
anybody off,

28:30.000 --> 28:36.000
no record companies. You had to
be politically correct. That's
what the rock and roll video
station was

28:36.000 --> 28:40.000
and still is today. And so
Comedy Central of course got
a...

28:40.500 --> 28:43.500
over the years because they had
the same problem because it's
also an MTV network,

28:43.500 --> 28:45.500
so via a common company.

28:45.500 --> 28:50.500
Somehow they were allowed to
become the bastard child and of
course they've been very
successful

28:50.500 --> 28:56.500
with many shows on Comedy
Central, think of South Park,
think of Daily Show and of
course

28:56.500 --> 29:05.500
this new comedian who I just saw
on a bit torrent of Jay Leno,
was in David Chappelle,
America's

29:05.500 --> 29:10.500
funniest man and I'm also going
to download the Dave Chappelle
shows.

29:10.500 --> 29:21.500
So one thing that I of course
I'm just astounded by is that
Audible does not have RSS feeds.

29:21.500 --> 29:26.500
Think of the opportunity here,
just think of the opportunity if
I can create an RSS feed

29:26.500 --> 29:30.500
and say well I'm only interested
in these types of books where
I'm not interested in this

29:30.500 --> 29:37.500
or I like this particular staff
pick so give me his or her
recommendations in my feed.

29:37.500 --> 29:41.500
Oh it seems like so incredibly
simple to do this stuff.

29:42.000 --> 29:46.000
And you know what? Maybe there's
a market right there for someone
putting together a feed

29:46.000 --> 29:51.000
of audio books. It doesn't
necessarily have to be, you
don't have to be selling them.

29:51.000 --> 29:55.000
You could be through an
affiliate program. All kinds of
opportunities with this stuff.

29:55.000 --> 30:00.000
Okay, so what I did want to say
about the feedback loop of audio
blog.com, that really connected

30:00.000 --> 30:06.000
to me because what's so great
about radio is that you are
always involved in a community.

30:06.000 --> 30:11.000
Typically, or at least the way I
think radio works best, it's
within a city, or within

30:11.000 --> 30:17.000
a certain region so that they're
talking about stuff that you are
familiar with. And not

30:17.000 --> 30:22.000
just some guy like sitting at
Clear Channel pushing buttons,
firing off local jingles.

30:22.000 --> 30:29.000
So on Philadelphia, it sounds
like he's local and saying, you
know, in Iowa. And another

30:29.000 --> 30:34.000
part of that community is that
radio stations often use the
telephone as the feedback loop.

30:34.000 --> 30:39.000
So you can call in. Yeah, you
may not get on the air. In fact,
you probably won't get on

30:39.000 --> 30:43.000
the air, but I'll tell you, on
morning shows, there are many
lists.

30:43.500 --> 30:47.500
who are regulars because they
always have something funny to
say and some of them eventually

30:47.500 --> 30:50.500
get a hotline numbers they can
call in directly.

30:50.500 --> 30:54.500
But most of the time the calls
are screened at larger market
stations and these people are

30:54.500 --> 30:56.500
professionals they know how to
pick someone funny out of the...

31:01.500 --> 31:05.500
to create that feedback with
which is a beautiful one if you
think about it because here you
are

31:05.500 --> 31:10.500
you're listening to the radio
you're listening to a talk show
you hear someone say something
you hear

31:10.500 --> 31:14.500
a phone number you pick up the
cell you dial it you talk to a
producer if you're lucky you get
through

31:14.500 --> 31:21.500
you're on the air boom you know
you're on the radio you're in
the loop now our system won't
work as

31:21.500 --> 31:26.500
immediate as that but of course
it doesn't have all the
drawbacks of a centralized
system as well

31:26.500 --> 31:33.500
mainly that you can't own one
and you can't have one but we
can use this audio blog system

31:35.500 --> 31:40.500
now I thought about it just
briefly last night before I went
to sleep and we have to have
some

31:40.500 --> 31:49.500
kind of way of trying to tie in
you know maybe if this is the
source code for for September
3rd

31:49.500 --> 31:53.500
when you dial into a special
number you're going to say okay
I'm responding to the source
code

31:53.500 --> 32:01.500
September 3rd and maybe you you
type in oh nine oh three oh four
and then it knows that wherever
it

32:01.500 --> 32:10.500
sends this

32:03.000 --> 32:10.000
your message to it knows to
attach it to that audio blog
post or to that particular show
in

32:10.000 --> 32:15.000
the ART program and the archive,
which could be here we go I'm
thinking now I know developers

32:15.000 --> 32:24.000
out there help me out here. In
theory I think it should be
possible to make use of the
comments element

32:25.000 --> 32:35.000
in RSS 2.0 and I think that if
I'm mistaken the comments can
also have their own RSS 2.0 feed

32:36.000 --> 32:43.000
and then those would include
enclosure attachments of the
audio blog responses.

32:44.000 --> 32:49.000
Now the first thing I thought in
this structure is okay that's
great but we're going to get
lots and

32:49.000 --> 32:55.000
lots of spam of people calling
up and I said well you know
what? No we won't because we're
going to

32:55.000 --> 33:01.000
charge him. If you want to
comment then you know you're
going to have to pay a little
bit so that

33:02.000 --> 33:04.000
the service is paid for and so

33:04.500 --> 33:07.500
that the feedback loop is
completed and also to combat
spam.

33:07.500 --> 33:14.500
If people had to spend money on
email spam, there would be a
hell of a lot less spam.

33:14.500 --> 33:17.500
So that should be fairly easy to
set up.

33:17.500 --> 33:20.500
And maybe a way to make money.

33:20.500 --> 33:26.500
If you haven't got enough people
who are compelled to drop 50
cents or a dollar or God knows
how

33:26.500 --> 33:29.500
much, maybe 20 cents or 9 cents,
I don't know.

33:29.500 --> 33:32.500
If you have enough or calling
up, that could be interesting.

33:33.500 --> 33:35.500
But anyway, the feedback loop is
the main thing.

33:35.500 --> 33:42.500
And I'm going to look into audio
blog.com and see what kind of
API, the application programming
interface.

33:42.500 --> 33:51.500
See what we can do if we can
talk to it, if we can tie it
into existing programs and

33:51.500 --> 33:54.500
then in an archive using the
current weblog technologies.

33:54.500 --> 34:01.500
And they sound a little bit
discombobulated, but it is
because I'm still trying to
figure it all out.

34:01.500 --> 34:05.500
Okay, we are damn 34 minutes
into this.

34:05.500 --> 34:05.500
It's my birth.

34:06.000 --> 34:11.000
day today so I get to select the
song of the day and I chose for
a classic by Jackie

34:11.000 --> 34:17.000
DeShire. What the world needs
now is love, sweet love, people
are thinking.

34:18.750 --> 37:16.250
[ Music ]

37:22.000 --> 37:26.000
I play a song on the day because
someone came online and my eye
chat definitely let me

37:26.000 --> 37:31.000
know about that in the middle of
Jackie D'Shanan's what the world
needs now, which is really my

37:31.000 --> 37:35.000
only true birthday wish. And
that's it for source code for
today. We'll be back to,

37:35.000 --> 37:39.000
no, promise myself we're going
to do anything on weekend. So
tomorrow, I'm at the air show

37:39.000 --> 37:44.000
and Lailie start all day. I'm
being picked up at 10. We're
flying in. I'll be there until

37:44.000 --> 37:49.000
about 5. And I will be updating.
What I'll do is I'll see if I
can keep the computer running

37:49.000 --> 37:55.000
here so I can do some GSM phone
updates and also take the big
camera for some really high

37:55.000 --> 37:59.000
quality pictures because there's
going to be some classic planes
there and if you're

37:59.000 --> 38:04.000
into aviation, it should be
exciting. So look for that
tomorrow on live dot curry dot

38:04.500 --> 38:09.500
If you want to respond just
leave a comment there on the
post for this program for today

38:09.500 --> 38:15.500
Or of course you can also send
an email at atom at curry dot
com and I will see you on Monday

38:15.500 --> 38:17.500
Have a good one everybody bye
bye

38:21.000 --> 38:23.000
I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

38:43.500 --> 38:45.500
I'm not sure I can win here.

38:45.500 --> 38:47.500
But I'm not sure I can win.

38:47.500 --> 38:49.500
I'm not sure I can win.
