WEBVTT

00:00.000 --> 00:26.000
This is the Daily Source Code,
and now here's Adam Curry.

00:26.000 --> 00:37.300
Hey, well, good afternoon
everybody. A brand new opening
for the show, this
listener-supported

00:37.300 --> 00:41.600
show where users and developers
party together at your Daily
Source Code, thanks to Howard

00:41.600 --> 00:51.600
Greensteen, Howard from New
York, who's also requested that
I play some Barry Corral on

00:51.600 --> 00:54.720
the show, which I'll certainly
do once I can find my exclusive
live recording

00:54.720 --> 01:01.500
over. So, welcome to the Source
Code for Monday. Today is the
27th of September 2004.

01:01.500 --> 01:05.520
It's quarter to four in the
afternoon, coming to you from
Flanders, Belgium,

01:05.520 --> 01:09.800
from Curry Castle, and we have a
lot to talk about today. So much
has happened

01:09.800 --> 01:13.840
over the weekend and it was
several times I was just itching
to jump

01:13.840 --> 01:20.940
behind the machine and come on
in, huh? It's okay, I'm
recording. Alright? Yeah. I just

01:20.940 --> 01:25.020
wanted to jump behind the
machine and cut a Source Code,
but I really, you know,

01:25.020 --> 01:28.780
there was just so much else
going on, and Christina, who
just walked into the

01:28.780 --> 01:35.320
bar slash studio area, who has
the day off today from school,
she won bronze

01:35.320 --> 01:41.460
medal with her, that was the
national championships with her
dressage, horse

01:41.520 --> 01:49.920
riding team. Congratulations,
Christina. She's very talkative
today. Thank you. So, I

01:49.920 --> 01:54.720
did have a couple chats with
different people over the
weekend. Let's see, with

01:54.720 --> 01:59.400
Steve Gilmore, that was a Skype
chat. I've spoke to Dave Weiner
a couple of

01:59.400 --> 02:03.240
times, and I've had lots of
email conversation with people,
because

02:03.240 --> 02:06.160
stuff was just happening over
the weekend. It was amazing.
Things are

02:06.160 --> 02:11.280
going so quickly. And the first
thing I wanted to play for you
today was, and

02:11.300 --> 02:16.460
I don't think I played this on
Friday. If I did, I apologize.
But remember Dr. Dave

02:16.460 --> 02:22.540
from Las Vegas gave me all the
tips and pointers on how to
record the daily

02:22.540 --> 02:27.420
Source Code at the equal or
close to equal quality of sound,
but with half

02:27.420 --> 02:32.140
the file size. And as you
probably noticed from Friday's
Source Code, the

02:32.140 --> 02:35.380
file was indeed about half the
file size. And I think the audio
was still

02:35.400 --> 02:43.600
reasonably good. So props go out
to Dr. Dave. There was a couple
of

02:43.600 --> 02:46.800
discrepancies, and I thought I
caught it, and I thought that I
also thought,

02:46.800 --> 02:52.280
well, maybe he's confusing bits
with Hertz and whatever. But
Doug Kay, who is

02:52.280 --> 02:58.480
the producer of
ITConversations.com, the whole
outfit is his as far as I

02:58.480 --> 03:03.680
know. By the way, Mia Culpa,
during the first or second trade
secrets, I

03:03.980 --> 03:08.060
said that I didn't think that
Doug Kay was a streaming guy,
and he sent me a

03:08.060 --> 03:13.860
very friendly email explaining
exactly how much of a streaming
guy he is. So I

03:13.860 --> 03:20.020
stand corrected big time. And of
course, he's hosting all the
ITConversations

03:20.020 --> 03:24.880
and he's also, he's in with us
here, and on the loop on the
iPod

03:24.880 --> 03:28.740
platform, and he's a content
producer. It's great. And he has
a lot of

03:28.740 --> 03:32.260
experience with file sizes and
recordings, and he came back
with

03:32.260 --> 03:36.800
the response, which is an audio,
that's very nice, to Dr. Dave.
So without

03:36.800 --> 03:41.320
further ado, here's Doug Kay
with more tips on how to reduce
your file size.

03:41.720 --> 03:45.120
Hello, Adam and listeners to the
Daily Source Code. This is Doug
Kay, the

03:45.120 --> 03:49.000
host and producer of
ITConversations. And I just
wanted to respond to

03:49.000 --> 03:53.640
something you broadcast in your
show on Friday. It was a clip
from Dr. Dave

03:53.640 --> 03:57.280
of Las Vegas, and Dr. Dave was
trying to answer the question
about

03:57.280 --> 04:00.360
what bit rates to use. And
unfortunately, he made a fairly
significant

04:00.380 --> 04:06.220
error. He said, for example,
that a 32K bit rate was totally
adequate

04:06.220 --> 04:09.900
for voice that it reproduced 16
kilohertz audio that it was as
good

04:09.900 --> 04:13.340
as FM. And that's not the case.
Dr. Dave is confusing a couple
of

04:13.340 --> 04:17.340
different technological issues.
He's confusing the bit rate of
the

04:17.340 --> 04:22.660
MP3 audio with the sample rate.
The sample rate is controlled by

04:22.660 --> 04:25.740
something called the sub nyquist
theorem. The sub nyquist theorem

04:25.740 --> 04:29.220
says that if you want to sample
analog data and reproduce it

04:29.220 --> 04:33.400
accurately, that you must sample
at twice the highest frequency

04:33.400 --> 04:36.600
you want to reproduce. So for
example, if you want to
reproduce

04:36.600 --> 04:42.240
16 kilohertz audio, you need to
have 32,000 samples per second.
Now

04:42.240 --> 04:46.280
in WAV file format, which is a
lossless format, those are

04:46.280 --> 04:50.600
typically 16 bit samples or two
byte samples. So sampling at

04:50.640 --> 04:56.360
32,000 samples per second is
actually 64,000 bytes per

04:56.380 --> 05:02.060
second, which is in fact 512,000
bits per second. So that's the

05:02.060 --> 05:05.300
sample rate, but it has
relatively little to do with the
bit

05:05.300 --> 05:09.220
rate of the MP3 encoder MP3 is a
lossy compression technique

05:09.340 --> 05:12.460
similar to JPEG. We're going to
throw away a lot of data when

05:12.460 --> 05:15.860
we get these compression ratios
of 2030 40 to one and so forth.

05:16.340 --> 05:21.220
A 64K bit per second MP3 is
generally considered the

05:21.220 --> 05:26.180
equivalent of FM. It's arguable.
I think that a 64K MP3

05:26.180 --> 05:30.000
doesn't sound quite as good as
good FM. I think a 96K bit per

05:30.000 --> 05:33.800
second MP3 is closer to a good
FM signal, but that depends on
the

05:33.800 --> 05:37.440
program material. Here's a brief
history of the MP3 encoding

05:37.440 --> 05:40.400
rates we've used here at IT
Conversations. When I started

05:40.400 --> 05:43.680
a year and a half ago, I encoded
everything at 32K bits per

05:43.680 --> 05:47.040
second. The quality wasn't good,
but I still got a number of

05:47.040 --> 05:50.160
complaints that the files were
too big. The reason was that

05:50.160 --> 05:53.600
the MP3 players in those days
could not take very large

05:53.600 --> 05:57.460
files. Over time things have
changed quite quickly. Until

05:57.460 --> 06:01.180
recently we encoded everything
at 48K bits per second. We got

06:01.180 --> 06:05.620
very few complaints. But now
people who have MP3 players that

06:05.620 --> 06:09.660
have quite a bit more storage,
such as a 40 gigabyte iPod, are

06:09.660 --> 06:13.220
asking us to use higher quality
bit rates. They don't mind the

06:13.220 --> 06:16.820
larger files. So just within the
past week, I've started

06:16.820 --> 06:21.500
encoding our files at 64K bits
per second. That results in

06:21.500 --> 06:24.840
about 30 megabytes for one hour
of audio. And that's my

06:24.840 --> 06:27.760
current recommendation for what
people should be using for

06:27.760 --> 06:32.000
audio blogs, daily source code
and the like. By the way, it's

06:32.000 --> 06:36.560
also not true that you need a
higher bit rate for music than

06:36.560 --> 06:40.400
for voice. The waveform of human
voice is very, very

06:40.400 --> 06:43.560
complex. And in fact, you will
hear distortion in the

06:43.560 --> 06:47.320
human voice before you can
detect it in most music. The

06:47.320 --> 06:50.360
reason being that you may not
know how to predict the

06:50.360 --> 06:53.300
waveform in music, whereas with
voice, if you know the

06:53.300 --> 06:55.700
person, you have certain
expectations of what their

06:55.700 --> 06:58.900
voice will sound like. Another
question that comes up is

06:58.900 --> 07:01.700
stereo versus mono. And do you
need double the bit rate

07:01.700 --> 07:05.300
for stereo? Or are stereo files
twice as large as

07:05.300 --> 07:08.500
mono files? In wave files, they
are twice as large

07:08.500 --> 07:12.500
because it is a lossless format.
But in MP3, one of the

07:12.500 --> 07:15.060
things that you're encoding is
the difference between the

07:15.060 --> 07:17.300
left and right channels. So for
example, if you're

07:17.300 --> 07:19.900
recording voice from a single
microphone, it really

07:19.900 --> 07:24.400
doesn't matter whether you use a
stereo MP3 at 64K or a

07:24.400 --> 07:27.500
mono MP3 at 64K bits per second
because they'll be

07:27.500 --> 07:30.600
essentially the same. The only
time that it really

07:30.600 --> 07:33.100
matters is when you have program
material where the

07:33.100 --> 07:36.300
left and right channels are
substantially different. As

07:36.300 --> 07:39.900
to the question of VBR or
variable bit rate, this

07:39.900 --> 07:43.000
is a technique that does allow
the MP3 to vary the

07:43.000 --> 07:46.000
bit rate from one frame to the
next, but it's not

07:46.000 --> 07:48.340
supported by certain players. So
I do not recommend

07:48.340 --> 07:51.440
recording VBR for audio blogs
and the like. There's

07:51.440 --> 07:53.540
really nothing to gain. Anyway,
if you have any

07:53.540 --> 07:57.640
questions, send me email dug at
itconversations.com

07:57.940 --> 08:00.440
or you might want to check out a
wiki page that I just

08:00.440 --> 08:06.640
posted to deal with this topic.
Go to www.itconversations.com

08:06.640 --> 08:10.940
slash wiki, W-I-K-I. And
somewhere there, you'll find

08:10.940 --> 08:14.140
a link to the page that deals
with MP3 encoders

08:14.140 --> 08:17.140
and file formats and things like
that. I hope this

08:17.140 --> 08:19.240
has been helpful. Keep up your
great work on the

08:19.240 --> 08:21.740
daily source code. So far, I
haven't missed a single

08:21.740 --> 08:24.440
show and I hope not to. Thanks.
Alrighty, thank you

08:24.440 --> 08:27.840
very much. Doug Kay from
itconversations.com. Wow,

08:27.840 --> 08:29.940
that was some excellent,
excellent source code he

08:29.940 --> 08:34.540
dumped on us. Indeed, after
listening to Dr.

08:34.540 --> 08:38.840
Dave from Vegas and the response
from Doug Kay,

08:38.840 --> 08:41.840
I did get my file size down to
about half and

08:41.840 --> 08:45.240
I am running also about 15 megs
per half hour,

08:45.240 --> 08:47.740
so about 30 megs for an hour.
And there was

08:47.740 --> 08:49.740
some mail that came in. Hold on
a second, I'm

08:49.740 --> 08:51.840
going to switch applications
here. Now, we've had

08:51.840 --> 08:53.940
bad luck with that in the past.
It's working out.

08:53.940 --> 08:56.440
From Eric Elliott, I just want
to share that

08:56.440 --> 08:57.840
with you. He said, I had a
chance to catch up

08:57.840 --> 08:59.640
listening to you this past
week's daily source

08:59.640 --> 09:01.540
code, also trade secret show
with Dave.

09:01.540 --> 09:03.140
Want to address one topic that
you mentioned

09:03.140 --> 09:04.640
both in one of your daily source
codes and

09:04.640 --> 09:08.240
on trade secrets is about the
AAC audio format.

09:08.240 --> 09:10.140
He says, now I certainly don't
have any arguments

09:10.140 --> 09:12.740
against using MP3 and that would
be my choice

09:12.740 --> 09:14.340
too since it's the most widely
universally

09:14.340 --> 09:16.440
accepted format right now, but I
wanted to

09:16.440 --> 09:19.740
clear up a misconception about
AAC. AAC is

09:19.740 --> 09:22.640
not Apple's proprietary format.
It's a

09:22.640 --> 09:24.540
standard that was basically
developed by the

09:24.540 --> 09:27.640
MPEG group as the successor to
MP3. It is

09:27.640 --> 09:30.240
actually the audio component to
MPEG-4

09:30.240 --> 09:33.940
video. However, what is
proprietary is the

09:33.940 --> 09:36.540
fair play DRM, that's digital
rights

09:36.540 --> 09:38.740
management, that Apple has put
on top of

09:38.740 --> 09:42.340
AAC in the iTunes music store.
The reason

09:42.340 --> 09:44.440
that the iTunes purchase from

09:44.440 --> 09:46.540
iTunes music store only work on
iTunes and

09:46.540 --> 09:49.940
the iPod is because the DRM, not
AAC, but

09:49.940 --> 09:52.340
a non-fair play AAC will play on
a

09:52.340 --> 09:55.240
variety of players. Just wanted
to clear

09:55.240 --> 09:57.640
that up. That's Eric Elliott.
Thank you

09:57.640 --> 10:00.640
very much Eric and he also posts
a link

10:00.640 --> 10:04.440
Apple.com slash MPEG-4 slash AAC
for

10:04.440 --> 10:06.840
some more information on that.
Excellent.

10:06.840 --> 10:10.340
So I still think we should stick
with

10:10.440 --> 10:12.840
MP3, but I'd like to hear a
little bit more

10:12.840 --> 10:14.240
if people have more information.
You know,

10:14.240 --> 10:17.840
this is a format that is just
as, I don't

10:17.840 --> 10:19.140
know if it's just, if it can be
just as

10:19.140 --> 10:21.840
open as MP3. Who controls MP3?
No one.

10:21.840 --> 10:23.440
Is there a standards body or
something? I

10:23.440 --> 10:25.540
don't think so. Well, there
probably is

10:25.540 --> 10:28.540
and I'm sure by now people will
already

10:28.540 --> 10:30.840
be hacking away the email. Set
me straight.

10:30.840 --> 10:32.840
What I'm going to do right now
is

10:32.840 --> 10:34.840
probably inviting Murphy in, but
I just

10:34.840 --> 10:37.340
wanted to take a screenshot of
my setup

10:37.340 --> 10:39.340
so you can see how I've got the
show

10:39.340 --> 10:41.340
lined up for today because I
don't have

10:41.340 --> 10:43.340
notes. I used to keep an
outliner handy

10:43.340 --> 10:46.840
with notes and now I just have
all of my

10:46.840 --> 10:48.840
my different sound clips and I
have quite

10:48.840 --> 10:50.840
quite a few all set up and ready
to fire

10:50.840 --> 10:52.840
and they're in a chronological
order.

10:52.840 --> 10:54.840
So it may screw up the recording
but

10:54.840 --> 10:56.840
I'm just going to try this. Hold
on.

10:59.340 --> 11:01.340
It's thinking about it.

11:03.340 --> 11:05.840
Okay. Let me just see.

11:06.840 --> 11:09.340
Yep. It took a picture. Okay.
Great.

11:09.340 --> 11:10.840
So we've got that and I'll post
that

11:10.840 --> 11:14.340
because great excitement for me
over

11:14.340 --> 11:17.340
the weekend. Just as I was, you
know,

11:17.340 --> 11:19.840
about to give up on the Rubik's
Cube

11:19.840 --> 11:21.840
of how we can route audio back
and forth

11:21.840 --> 11:24.340
particularly like a radio
station does

11:24.340 --> 11:26.340
where you call into a show, in
this

11:26.340 --> 11:28.340
case the call in is through
iChat or

11:28.340 --> 11:31.840
AOL Intim Messenger or Skype or

11:31.840 --> 11:35.840
SIP phone and we hear you on the
air

11:35.840 --> 11:37.340
and we can control your volume,
turn

11:37.340 --> 11:39.340
you on or off, but you also hear

11:39.340 --> 11:40.840
everything we're doing on the
air

11:40.840 --> 11:42.840
minus your voice. So you can't
be

11:42.840 --> 11:44.340
sending back a total signal
because

11:44.340 --> 11:46.340
then you get this feedback loop
and

11:46.340 --> 11:48.840
to me that was a Rubik's Cube
I've

11:48.840 --> 11:50.840
been struggling with for two
weeks

11:50.840 --> 11:54.340
now and I ran across actually
through

11:54.340 --> 11:58.840
my referral log Hugo Schottmann.

11:58.840 --> 12:01.840
He's from, see he lives in
Zurich

12:01.840 --> 12:03.840
and you can check out his weblog
at

12:03.840 --> 12:06.840
log.hugoschottmann.com

12:06.840 --> 12:10.840
slash Hugo probably just
www.hugoschottmann.com

12:10.840 --> 12:16.840
will work and that's
H-U-G-O-S-C-H-O-T-M-A-N

12:16.840 --> 12:19.840
dot com and Hugo had been

12:19.840 --> 12:21.840
he posted this whole bit on his
blog

12:21.840 --> 12:23.840
about how he'd been listening to
me

12:23.840 --> 12:25.340
trying to figure it out and
check out

12:25.340 --> 12:27.340
the trade secrets and he came up

12:27.340 --> 12:29.340
with a proof of concept and he

12:29.340 --> 12:31.340
actually recorded both sides of
the

12:31.340 --> 12:33.340
conversation. I thought for a
second

12:33.340 --> 12:35.340
there that he had also run into
the

12:35.340 --> 12:37.340
echo problem, but it turns out
he

12:37.340 --> 12:39.340
didn't and he had indeed found
the

12:39.340 --> 12:41.340
perfect setup and posted a
diagram

12:41.340 --> 12:43.340
and it was beautiful. Now I had

12:43.340 --> 12:45.340
downloaded the Soundflower
virtual

12:45.340 --> 12:47.340
audio device a while ago in the

12:47.340 --> 12:49.340
beginning of my quest to figure
out

12:49.340 --> 12:51.340
the perfect setup and just
around

12:51.340 --> 12:53.340
when you know he's doing this

12:53.340 --> 12:55.340
setup all of a sudden things
start

12:55.340 --> 12:57.340
to click in my head. Maybe it
was just

12:57.340 --> 12:59.340
from listening to his MP3
because he

12:59.340 --> 13:01.340
hadn't posted it to a site yet
but I

13:01.340 --> 13:03.340
was listening and like I think
he

13:03.340 --> 13:05.340
might be you know maybe he did
it

13:05.340 --> 13:07.340
this way and even though we came
up

13:07.340 --> 13:09.340
with a different way of doing it
I'm

13:09.340 --> 13:11.340
using Audio Hijack Pro and he's

13:11.340 --> 13:13.340
using a different, see what

13:13.340 --> 13:15.340
application is he using to
record

13:15.340 --> 13:17.340
and he's also using GarageBand

13:17.340 --> 13:19.340
which I used to use and now

13:19.340 --> 13:21.340
longer he's just posted a whole

13:21.340 --> 13:23.340
bunch of updates with great

13:23.340 --> 13:25.340
soundtracks I think, yeah

13:25.340 --> 13:27.340
soundtrack to record

13:27.340 --> 13:29.340
and you know what you need no
external

13:29.340 --> 13:31.340
gear and the Soundflower

13:31.340 --> 13:33.340
virtual device

13:33.340 --> 13:35.340
it's open source

13:35.340 --> 13:37.340
it's freely available so please
check out

13:37.340 --> 13:39.340
Hugo's weblog it is

13:39.340 --> 13:41.340
phenomenal I'm so

13:41.340 --> 13:43.340
pleased that we have someone
who's

13:43.340 --> 13:45.340
all over this and is helping us

13:45.340 --> 13:47.340
set it up. Now granted this is
all still on a

13:47.340 --> 13:49.340
Mac and actually when I did a
test call

13:49.340 --> 13:51.340
with Dave he was crying saying
you know

13:51.340 --> 13:53.340
I want to play music too

13:53.340 --> 13:55.340
I was jamming tunes down the
pipe too

13:55.340 --> 13:57.340
and it was great

13:57.340 --> 13:59.340
so we will keep working

13:59.340 --> 14:01.340
at it. Let me see

14:01.340 --> 14:03.340
actually I just got back

14:03.340 --> 14:05.340
from a quick trip up to Breda

14:05.340 --> 14:07.340
it's about 30 minutes from our
house

14:07.340 --> 14:09.340
by car that's in the Netherlands

14:09.340 --> 14:11.340
where coffee shops are legal I
had to

14:11.340 --> 14:13.340
go get a new supply

14:13.340 --> 14:15.340
I have actually the harvest that
I had

14:15.340 --> 14:17.340
here at home for those of you
following

14:17.340 --> 14:19.340
I have tried it it's

14:19.340 --> 14:21.340
okay but it's saying because

14:21.340 --> 14:23.340
it's all totally organic and I
didn't

14:23.340 --> 14:25.340
really use anything

14:25.340 --> 14:27.340
special on it you got to smoke
an awful

14:27.340 --> 14:29.340
lot before it has

14:29.340 --> 14:31.340
the desired effect so anyways

14:31.340 --> 14:33.340
I went up to get a little supply
these guys

14:33.340 --> 14:35.340
that run the coffee shop from
Morocco so

14:35.340 --> 14:37.340
they're all Arabs

14:37.340 --> 14:39.340
and I know them really well and
we hang

14:39.340 --> 14:41.340
out and we drink

14:41.340 --> 14:43.340
Chinese tea, Moroccan tea

14:43.340 --> 14:45.340
which is basically Chinese tea
with mint leaves

14:45.340 --> 14:47.340
and a ton of sugar in there

14:47.340 --> 14:49.340
and so we're just chilling out
and we're

14:49.340 --> 14:51.340
talking and he was reading a
Moroccan

14:51.340 --> 14:53.340
newspaper and it was a picture
of Bush

14:53.340 --> 14:55.340
and Kerry on the front page

14:55.340 --> 14:57.340
and we got to talking

14:57.340 --> 14:59.340
and it was just

14:59.340 --> 15:01.340
I think what we concluded and it
would have really made for

15:01.340 --> 15:03.340
a good podcast

15:03.340 --> 15:05.340
although it was in

15:05.340 --> 15:07.340
like four different languages it
was

15:07.340 --> 15:09.340
in Morocco besides

15:09.340 --> 15:11.340
Arabic they also speak French

15:11.340 --> 15:13.340
so it was French it was Dutch

15:13.340 --> 15:15.340
it was English it was

15:15.340 --> 15:17.340
some Arabic words

15:17.340 --> 15:19.340
some general high Arabic

15:19.340 --> 15:21.340
which is generally

15:21.340 --> 15:23.340
understood and so

15:23.340 --> 15:25.340
I think what we

15:25.340 --> 15:27.340
concluded was that

15:27.340 --> 15:29.340
all politicians

15:29.340 --> 15:31.340
everyone in government is

15:31.340 --> 15:33.340
they're all in it for the money

15:33.340 --> 15:35.340
most of them are in it for the
money

15:35.340 --> 15:37.340
all the big guys are

15:37.340 --> 15:39.340
what was he telling me he's
saying the new president

15:39.340 --> 15:41.340
of

15:41.340 --> 15:43.340
Palestine so there's a new guy

15:43.340 --> 15:45.340
he apparently owns a huge
factory in Israel

15:45.340 --> 15:47.340
you know it's like everyone's

15:47.340 --> 15:49.340
just in the game for

15:49.340 --> 15:51.340
for a lot of their own

15:51.340 --> 15:53.340
interests and certainly we know
Bush is and he said

15:53.340 --> 15:55.340
you know

15:55.340 --> 15:57.340
maybe if we get Kerry then

15:57.340 --> 15:59.340
we have a chance at figuring out
what he's about

15:59.340 --> 16:01.340
before

16:01.340 --> 16:03.340
he can really get his hoax in
but Kerry

16:03.340 --> 16:05.340
is the same there's big money
there

16:05.340 --> 16:07.340
there's his wife with Heinz

16:07.340 --> 16:09.340
there's all kinds of

16:09.340 --> 16:11.340
cronyism and nepotism

16:11.340 --> 16:13.340
and everything going on in
government

16:13.340 --> 16:15.340
at all different levels

16:15.340 --> 16:17.340
and I think what we basically
concluded is

16:17.340 --> 16:19.340
you know in 30 years

16:19.340 --> 16:21.340
there will be a new generation

16:21.340 --> 16:23.340
there'll be our kids and they'll
hopefully have grown up a little
bit

16:23.340 --> 16:25.340
differently and they'll have
different

16:25.340 --> 16:27.340
values and we'll think about
religion

16:27.340 --> 16:29.340
differently and won't hate each
other

16:29.340 --> 16:31.340
kind of like

16:31.340 --> 16:33.340
the Germans now

16:33.340 --> 16:35.340
Germany completely

16:35.340 --> 16:37.340
flattened the Netherlands

16:37.340 --> 16:39.340
occupied it outright just killed
people

16:39.340 --> 16:41.340
shipped off a million Jews

16:41.340 --> 16:43.340
flattened Rotterdam

16:43.340 --> 16:45.340
and the Germans

16:45.340 --> 16:47.340
still come to Holland on
vacation

16:47.340 --> 16:49.340
they sit on our beaches and we
get along fine

16:49.340 --> 16:51.340
and all the young German

16:51.340 --> 16:53.340
generation of my generation

16:53.340 --> 16:55.340
30 to 40 years old

16:55.340 --> 16:57.340
we don't give a fuck about what
happened then

16:57.340 --> 16:59.340
we hope we can learn from it and
we get along

16:59.340 --> 17:01.340
and there's no animosity and
that eventually will probably
happen

17:01.340 --> 17:03.340
in other parts

17:03.340 --> 17:05.340
of the world where huge conflict

17:05.340 --> 17:07.340
is abound at this time

17:09.340 --> 17:11.340
there was a couple other points

17:11.340 --> 17:13.340
that we came up with

17:13.340 --> 17:15.340
well I said that

17:15.340 --> 17:17.340
clearly this is where the

17:17.340 --> 17:19.340
internet probably will speed up
that cycle

17:19.340 --> 17:21.340
I'm hoping 10 years maybe

17:21.340 --> 17:23.340
because we're just not buying it
anymore

17:23.340 --> 17:25.340
we're not buying what's in the
media

17:25.340 --> 17:27.340
we're not buying what's in

17:27.340 --> 17:29.340
what's being shown on television
the speeches

17:29.340 --> 17:31.340
we're being lied to, you know
you're being lied to

17:31.340 --> 17:33.340
read the small print, read the
fine letters

17:33.340 --> 17:35.340
that go by

17:35.340 --> 17:37.340
within a millisecond that you're

17:37.340 --> 17:39.340
supposed to read that disclaimer

17:39.340 --> 17:41.340
and know that your actual
results will vary

17:41.340 --> 17:43.340
due to road and weather
conditions

17:43.340 --> 17:45.340
but anyway

17:45.340 --> 17:47.340
it was always fun to have a
political conversation

17:47.340 --> 17:49.340
in four different languages

17:49.340 --> 17:51.340
while drinking some

17:51.340 --> 17:53.340
Moroccan tea and

17:53.340 --> 17:55.340
smoking some wonderful

17:55.340 --> 17:57.340
plant of mother earth

17:59.340 --> 18:01.340
but when I got back I checked

18:01.340 --> 18:03.340
my iPod or inbox better known as

18:03.340 --> 18:05.340
my iPod and I saw

18:05.340 --> 18:07.340
a whole bunch of interesting new
bush clips

18:07.340 --> 18:09.340
that had come up and I figured I
might as well

18:09.340 --> 18:11.340
just do a little bush block here

18:11.340 --> 18:13.340
including a political poem

18:13.340 --> 18:15.340
so first let me get to this
first one

18:15.340 --> 18:17.340
it's probably been circulating
around the internet

18:17.340 --> 18:19.340
that's why it shows up on the
blog digger MP3 feed

18:19.340 --> 18:21.340
this is

18:21.340 --> 18:23.340
and it's Bush basically

18:23.340 --> 18:25.340
fucking up whatever he's saying

18:25.340 --> 18:27.340
he's trying to say peace

18:27.340 --> 18:29.340
but it comes out a little bit
differently

18:29.340 --> 18:31.340
listen to this little clip

18:31.340 --> 18:33.340
it's in the interest of

18:33.340 --> 18:35.340
a long-term peace in the world

18:35.340 --> 18:37.340
that we work for

18:37.340 --> 18:39.340
a free and secure

18:39.340 --> 18:41.340
and peaceful Iraq

18:41.340 --> 18:43.340
a peon's free and secure

18:43.340 --> 18:45.340
Iraq in the midst of the Middle
East

18:45.340 --> 18:47.340
will have enormous historical
impact

18:47.340 --> 18:49.340
a peon's free and

18:49.340 --> 18:51.340
George hold on I'll roll that
back

18:51.340 --> 18:53.340
so you don't have to do it okay

18:53.340 --> 18:55.340
let's listen that again

18:57.340 --> 18:59.340
and secure

18:59.340 --> 19:01.340
and peaceful Iraq

19:01.340 --> 19:03.340
a peon's free and secure Iraq

19:03.340 --> 19:05.340
in the midst of the Middle East

19:05.340 --> 19:07.340
will have enormous historical
impact

19:07.340 --> 19:09.340
a peon's free and secure Iraq

19:09.340 --> 19:11.340
so that was one guffaw that

19:11.340 --> 19:13.340
I don't know where that came
from

19:13.340 --> 19:15.340
this is my favorite one

19:15.340 --> 19:17.340
and I'm sure this is going to
come back

19:17.340 --> 19:19.340
to haunt George W

19:19.340 --> 19:21.340
during his many years as
ex-president

19:21.340 --> 19:23.340
and they want us to leave

19:23.340 --> 19:25.340
that's what they want us to do

19:25.340 --> 19:27.340
and I think the world would be
better off

19:27.340 --> 19:29.340
if we did leave

19:29.340 --> 19:31.340
the world would be worse

19:31.340 --> 19:33.340
the world is better off if it's
not leaving

19:33.340 --> 19:35.340
what?

19:35.340 --> 19:37.340
okay as the source code
continues

19:37.340 --> 19:39.340
for Monday the 27th

19:39.340 --> 19:41.340
I've got a political poem for
you

19:41.340 --> 19:43.340
and it just showed up in my iPod

19:43.340 --> 19:45.340
it's pretty good listen to it

19:59.340 --> 20:01.340
so they said something that

20:01.340 --> 20:03.340
maybe they shouldn't have said
now

20:03.340 --> 20:05.340
I'm not saying it was you

20:05.340 --> 20:07.340
and I'm not saying it was me

20:07.340 --> 20:09.340
and I'm not saying that maybe it
was somebody else

20:09.340 --> 20:11.340
maybe it wasn't

20:11.340 --> 20:13.340
I'm not saying anything anymore

20:17.340 --> 20:19.340
man I'm sorry this is nice music

20:19.340 --> 20:21.340
and I don't want to spoil it
with another

20:21.340 --> 20:23.340
political tirade cause

20:23.340 --> 20:25.340
I don't even like political
poetry

20:25.340 --> 20:27.340
cause most of it sucks and most
of the

20:27.340 --> 20:29.340
political stuff that comes to me
is even worse

20:29.340 --> 20:31.340
than the stuff that usually
comes to me

20:31.340 --> 20:33.340
but

20:33.340 --> 20:35.340
I hate this president even more
now

20:35.340 --> 20:37.340
than I did before 9-11

20:37.340 --> 20:39.340
a cancer on the world and in my
soul

20:39.340 --> 20:41.340
we have met the evil empire

20:41.340 --> 20:43.340
and it is us every one of us who
didn't vote

20:43.340 --> 20:45.340
maybe worse than I will vote

20:45.340 --> 20:47.340
from I hate everybody

20:47.340 --> 20:49.340
anyway I wrote this poem

20:49.340 --> 20:51.340
it's short it's me and spirited

20:51.340 --> 20:53.340
and I feel kind of bad about it

20:53.340 --> 20:55.340
but I mean I'm just so

20:55.340 --> 20:57.340
calm it goes like this

21:25.340 --> 21:27.340
die painfully slow with slow
pain

21:27.340 --> 21:29.340
John Ashcroft

21:29.340 --> 21:31.340
die slowly

21:31.340 --> 21:33.340
painfully

21:33.340 --> 21:35.340
you are all criminals

21:35.340 --> 21:37.340
you will never go to jail

21:37.340 --> 21:39.340
so just die as soon as possible

21:39.340 --> 21:41.340
with great pain slowly

21:41.340 --> 21:43.340
I would die the slowest

21:43.340 --> 21:45.340
most painful death of all of you

21:45.340 --> 21:47.340
if it meant that just half of
you

21:47.340 --> 21:49.340
would die now

21:49.340 --> 21:51.340
call me liberal call me twisted

21:51.340 --> 21:53.340
and sick I don't care

21:53.340 --> 21:55.340
I hate you all and I hope you
all die

21:57.340 --> 21:59.340
and that's the poem

21:59.340 --> 22:01.340
and that's fine except

22:01.340 --> 22:03.340
I mean what's the difference
anyway

22:03.340 --> 22:05.340
they die

22:05.340 --> 22:07.340
worse ones come take their place

22:11.250 --> 22:38.750
[ Music ]

22:39.340 --> 22:41.340
you know I really like poetry

22:41.340 --> 22:43.340
that doesn't sugarcoat it

22:43.340 --> 22:45.340
another political poem

22:45.340 --> 22:47.340
that was king missile 3

22:47.340 --> 22:49.340
I'm reading this from the id3
tags

22:49.340 --> 22:51.340
from the album royal lunch

22:51.340 --> 22:53.340
and oh man that's

22:53.340 --> 22:55.340
exercising your free speech
there isn't it

22:55.340 --> 22:57.340
damn but I think that

22:57.340 --> 22:59.340
just listening to that

22:59.340 --> 23:01.340
the point is maybe just like

23:01.340 --> 23:03.340
we had Hitler we had Stalin

23:03.340 --> 23:05.340
we had Mussolini and they're all
gone

23:05.340 --> 23:07.340
and new ones come with Idi Amin

23:07.340 --> 23:09.340
and they're dictators the world
over

23:09.340 --> 23:11.340
Gaddafi and

23:11.340 --> 23:13.340
they'll go eventually we all go

23:13.340 --> 23:15.340
and then new ones pop up

23:15.340 --> 23:17.340
and let's just hope that

23:17.340 --> 23:19.340
we can steer

23:19.340 --> 23:21.340
our leaders and I think that

23:21.340 --> 23:23.340
that's a lot about what

23:23.340 --> 23:25.340
what blogs are about and
podcasting

23:25.340 --> 23:27.340
it's exactly the same it's all
freedom of speech

23:27.340 --> 23:29.340
and it's really really important

23:29.340 --> 23:31.340
okay let me just go back to the
mail bag

23:31.340 --> 23:33.340
because I had a lot of mail

23:33.340 --> 23:35.340
that came in

23:35.340 --> 23:37.340
Jonathan Green sent me a note
about

23:37.340 --> 23:39.340
Mars edit I was raving about
that

23:39.340 --> 23:41.340
the other day hoping that

23:41.340 --> 23:43.340
they'll build in

23:43.340 --> 23:45.340
enclosure support pretty soon I
mean

23:45.340 --> 23:47.340
I've been using it now for the
past well

23:47.340 --> 23:49.340
it feels like about a week

23:49.340 --> 23:51.340
I like it very very much it's
really

23:51.340 --> 23:53.340
I have a central place for all
of my weblog publishing

23:53.340 --> 23:55.340
it's easy to edit

23:55.340 --> 23:57.340
there's just no waiting involved

23:57.340 --> 23:59.340
no waiting for browsers to
render

23:59.340 --> 24:01.340
it probably stores a local copy
of stuff

24:01.340 --> 24:03.340
in its own cache

24:03.340 --> 24:05.340
it's great it's really good
stuff

24:05.340 --> 24:07.340
and he suggested

24:07.340 --> 24:09.340
installing the book market

24:09.340 --> 24:11.340
because

24:11.340 --> 24:13.340
I said there was a script that
you can post from Safari

24:13.340 --> 24:15.340
it's called the script

24:15.340 --> 24:17.340
it goes from Safari in the Mars
edit

24:17.340 --> 24:19.340
scripts menu

24:19.340 --> 24:21.340
and the book market is cool

24:21.340 --> 24:23.340
because it does the same thing

24:23.340 --> 24:25.340
it also gives you a routing tag

24:25.340 --> 24:27.340
like via and then you put in
whoever it came from

24:27.340 --> 24:29.340
and

24:29.340 --> 24:31.340
just more good stuff smart

24:31.340 --> 24:33.340
smart user stuff that I'm really
enjoying using

24:35.340 --> 24:37.340
let me see

24:37.340 --> 24:39.340
what is this here

24:39.340 --> 24:41.340
this is just a shout out

24:41.340 --> 24:43.340
from Kurt Wendelkin

24:43.340 --> 24:45.340
IT Pro working for the U.S. Navy

24:45.340 --> 24:47.340
it says in case you've been
noticing

24:47.340 --> 24:49.340
the dot navy dot mill hits

24:49.340 --> 24:51.340
in your logs yet didn't go
unnoticed

24:51.340 --> 24:53.340
I try every day to move tech
users

24:53.340 --> 24:55.340
in my giant organization forward

24:55.340 --> 24:57.340
your stuff certainly helps me to
keep thinking

24:57.340 --> 24:59.340
I'm happy to hear it

24:59.340 --> 25:01.340
that's a lot about

25:01.340 --> 25:03.340
what the source code is for

25:03.340 --> 25:05.340
try to get users and developers
to party together

25:07.340 --> 25:09.340
hold on

25:09.340 --> 25:11.340
let me see I had a couple other
comments

25:11.340 --> 25:13.340
that came in through the web log

25:13.340 --> 25:15.340
oh yeah there is

25:15.340 --> 25:17.340
there have been some comments
about

25:17.340 --> 25:19.340
I posted that I'm pushing about
9 gigs

25:19.340 --> 25:21.340
a day out

25:21.340 --> 25:23.340
through my servers for

25:23.340 --> 25:25.340
for the daily source code and
trade secrets

25:25.340 --> 25:27.340
and I called that a bump in the
road

25:27.340 --> 25:29.340
and I mean that you know it is a
bump in the road

25:29.340 --> 25:31.340
we're going to fix this

25:31.340 --> 25:33.340
and I think the first and most
important

25:33.340 --> 25:35.340
thing we can do before we get it

25:35.340 --> 25:37.340
to the ISP level is getting bit
torrent

25:37.340 --> 25:39.340
fully integrated

25:39.340 --> 25:41.340
I played with that I finally
subscribed

25:41.340 --> 25:43.340
to my first bit torrent feed

25:43.340 --> 25:45.340
what is it

25:45.340 --> 25:47.340
it's the Air America archives

25:47.340 --> 25:49.340
they have an archive

25:49.340 --> 25:51.340
an RSS 2.0

25:51.340 --> 25:53.340
podcast feed for you to
subscribe to

25:53.340 --> 25:55.340
and

25:55.340 --> 25:57.340
it brings in recent shows

25:57.340 --> 25:59.340
through bit torrent

25:59.340 --> 26:01.340
as OGG files

26:01.340 --> 26:03.340
which is another compression

26:03.340 --> 26:05.340
standard which

26:05.340 --> 26:07.340
I think it's a pretty geeky
standard

26:07.340 --> 26:09.340
it compresses stuff incredibly

26:09.340 --> 26:11.340
I think it compresses about
twice as much as mp3

26:11.340 --> 26:13.340
at least it seems that way from
the file size

26:13.340 --> 26:15.340
iTunes doesn't support it out of
the box

26:15.340 --> 26:17.340
you have to download a plug in

26:17.340 --> 26:19.340
but anyway

26:19.340 --> 26:21.340
so if that's the way it's coming

26:21.340 --> 26:23.340
I still want to listen to it

26:23.340 --> 26:25.340
and

26:25.340 --> 26:27.340
iPod or X successfully

26:27.340 --> 26:29.340
got the bit torrents, downloaded
the show

26:29.340 --> 26:31.340
it created the folder

26:31.340 --> 26:33.340
I didn't quite put the files
into the folder

26:33.340 --> 26:35.340
and renamed them as mp.mp3

26:35.340 --> 26:37.340
instead of its original dot OGG
format

26:37.340 --> 26:39.340
we'll get all that worked out

26:39.340 --> 26:41.340
but the iPod or concept is there

26:41.340 --> 26:43.340
and it's working

26:43.340 --> 26:45.340
and what we need to do now

26:45.340 --> 26:47.340
is make the publishing of mp3

26:47.340 --> 26:49.340
a little more easier

26:49.340 --> 26:51.340
so that you don't have to go
through the process

26:51.340 --> 26:53.340
and I've done it myself just in

26:53.340 --> 26:55.340
local bench testing of

26:55.340 --> 26:57.340
okay here we go, first

26:57.340 --> 26:59.340
create the mp3 tags

26:59.340 --> 27:01.340
then I'm going to make a bit
torrent out of it

27:01.340 --> 27:03.340
then I have to upload the
torrent

27:03.340 --> 27:05.340
upload the file

27:05.340 --> 27:07.340
it's just

27:07.340 --> 27:09.340
a lot of

27:09.340 --> 27:11.340
a lot of steps to go through

27:11.340 --> 27:13.340
and then just briefly at the ISP
level

27:13.340 --> 27:15.340
I also did a test I threw up the
latest trade secrets

27:15.340 --> 27:17.340
on my .mac account

27:17.340 --> 27:19.340
where I bought a gigabyte of
disk space

27:19.340 --> 27:21.340
if you want to publish

27:21.340 --> 27:23.340
there's going to be pain
somewhere

27:23.340 --> 27:25.340
even if you have a weblog

27:25.340 --> 27:27.340
if you get slash dotted

27:27.340 --> 27:29.340
eventually you have to pay for
bandwidth

27:29.340 --> 27:31.340
now bandwidth is being
commoditized

27:31.340 --> 27:33.340
that can really help you

27:33.340 --> 27:35.340
but we want to make sure that
we're not

27:35.340 --> 27:37.340
victims of our own success here

27:37.340 --> 27:39.340
and shouldn't be

27:39.340 --> 27:41.340
that every single time your show
takes off

27:41.340 --> 27:43.340
and people are listening to you

27:43.340 --> 27:45.340
and you've got a popular show
that your bandwidth

27:45.340 --> 27:47.340
bill goes up that's not the
economy

27:47.340 --> 27:49.340
of scale that traditional

27:49.340 --> 27:51.340
radio or television have

27:51.340 --> 27:53.340
and I think that's where bit
torrent is going to

27:53.340 --> 27:55.340
is going to help us

27:55.340 --> 27:57.340
and that's mainly because this
is not streaming

27:57.340 --> 27:59.340
it's time shifting it's
downloading

27:59.340 --> 28:01.340
we can effectively distribute
the load

28:01.340 --> 28:03.340
and I think we're doing a pretty
good job

28:03.340 --> 28:05.340
so far with the integration of
bit torrent

28:05.340 --> 28:07.340
from what I've seen

28:07.340 --> 28:09.340
in iPod or X

28:11.340 --> 28:13.340
also Danny

28:13.340 --> 28:15.340
Gregor

28:15.340 --> 28:17.340
Gregory

28:17.340 --> 28:19.340
we've been emailing back and
forth

28:19.340 --> 28:21.340
and I mentioned him before on
the source code

28:21.340 --> 28:23.340
he's submitting a proposal

28:23.340 --> 28:25.340
with

28:25.340 --> 28:27.340
our buddy Dave Slusher from Evil
Genius Chronicles

28:27.340 --> 28:29.340
for the O'Reilly

28:29.340 --> 28:31.340
E-Tech conference

28:31.340 --> 28:33.340
and they're going to do it about

28:33.340 --> 28:35.340
podcasting

28:35.340 --> 28:37.340
and the iPod platform

28:37.340 --> 28:39.340
see if they actually have a

28:39.340 --> 28:41.340
I guess they're calling it
podcasting

28:41.340 --> 28:43.340
and they invited me to go along
with them

28:43.340 --> 28:45.340
now that's not going to work

28:45.340 --> 28:47.340
schedule wise with the move and
everything

28:47.340 --> 28:49.340
excuse me

28:49.340 --> 28:51.340
hold on let me just get rid of
this

28:53.340 --> 28:55.340
ah there we go that's better

28:55.340 --> 28:57.340
so I said but no please

28:57.340 --> 28:59.340
you guys go have a ball

28:59.340 --> 29:01.340
and let's see

29:01.340 --> 29:03.340
apparently that's the conference
to be at

29:03.340 --> 29:05.340
I don't know I don't really do a
lot of

29:05.340 --> 29:07.340
conferences

29:07.340 --> 29:09.340
certainly not conference
conferences

29:09.340 --> 29:11.340
but they're submitting a
proposal and I guess

29:11.340 --> 29:13.340
they're going to get out there
and

29:13.340 --> 29:15.340
we'll keep an eye on them

29:15.340 --> 29:17.340
and they'll be reporting to us
of course

29:17.340 --> 29:19.340
regarding

29:19.340 --> 29:21.340
conferences blogger con 3

29:21.340 --> 29:23.340
coming up the 6th of November

29:23.340 --> 29:25.340
in Palo Alto

29:25.340 --> 29:27.340
bloggercon.org is where you want
to

29:27.340 --> 29:29.340
check it out and I'll be leading
a discussion

29:29.340 --> 29:31.340
on podcasting myself

29:31.340 --> 29:33.340
and I wrote up a description
today

29:33.340 --> 29:35.340
you can check it out it's on the
web

29:35.340 --> 29:37.340
blog at bloggercon.com

29:37.340 --> 29:39.340
and if anyone listening to

29:39.340 --> 29:41.340
this podcast

29:41.340 --> 29:43.340
you know can

29:43.340 --> 29:45.340
come or is planning on coming
let me know

29:45.340 --> 29:47.340
you know let's get some stuff
set up

29:47.340 --> 29:49.340
I really hope we can have a
massive jam

29:49.340 --> 29:51.340
parties we're all bringing our
mobile studios

29:51.340 --> 29:53.340
and we need to talk about setups

29:53.340 --> 29:55.340
and how it works and all the
stuff

29:55.340 --> 29:57.340
that we're talking about on the
iPod or dev list

29:57.340 --> 29:59.340
you can hear by the way that

29:59.340 --> 30:01.340
our good buddy Luke is blowing
the leaves

30:01.340 --> 30:03.340
outside the castle

30:03.340 --> 30:05.340
at the moment outside of the bar

30:05.340 --> 30:07.340
door where we are

30:07.340 --> 30:09.340
alright let's play some more fun
stuff

30:09.340 --> 30:11.340
I got an

30:11.340 --> 30:13.340
email from

30:13.340 --> 30:15.340
Tony

30:15.340 --> 30:17.340
and now my email there we go

30:17.340 --> 30:19.340
Tony Khan

30:19.340 --> 30:21.340
he was another fan of the source
code

30:21.340 --> 30:23.340
he's in Boston

30:23.340 --> 30:25.340
and he's working at

30:25.340 --> 30:27.340
Public Radio at WGBH

30:27.340 --> 30:29.340
and

30:29.340 --> 30:31.340
he does let me see if he

30:31.340 --> 30:33.340
yeah I think he produces I don't
know if he hosts it

30:33.340 --> 30:35.340
but he produces a series of
short stories

30:35.340 --> 30:37.340
called Morning Stories

30:37.340 --> 30:39.340
and

30:39.340 --> 30:41.340
he pointed me to them and you
can get them in streaming

30:41.340 --> 30:43.340
there's also a download

30:43.340 --> 30:45.340
MP3 archive and they're really
good

30:45.340 --> 30:47.340
and so I suggested well you know

30:47.340 --> 30:49.340
dude why don't you get it

30:49.340 --> 30:51.340
an RSS 2.0

30:51.340 --> 30:53.340
podcasting feed together and
I'll point to it

30:53.340 --> 30:55.340
and then everyone can enjoy this
so it'll be that much better

30:55.340 --> 30:57.340
and so he said well yep

30:57.340 --> 30:59.340
certainly what is this

30:59.340 --> 31:01.340
quote here hi Adam wish there
was

31:01.340 --> 31:03.340
an RSS feed you're way ahead of
us that makes

31:03.340 --> 31:05.340
you such a force in changing

31:05.340 --> 31:07.340
the face of radio I'll see if I
can

31:07.340 --> 31:09.340
make it happen you know how hard
it is to make

31:09.340 --> 31:11.340
an elephant sized operation like
WGBH

31:11.340 --> 31:13.340
remember it can still dance

31:13.340 --> 31:15.340
Tony I'm sure you are teaching

31:15.340 --> 31:17.340
at New Steps as we speak

31:17.340 --> 31:19.340
and I want to play this bit

31:19.340 --> 31:21.340
which is one of the

31:21.340 --> 31:23.340
Morning Stories series

31:23.340 --> 31:25.340
and meanwhile hopefully by the
time we get back

31:25.340 --> 31:27.340
the leaf blowing will have
diminished a little bit

31:27.340 --> 31:29.340
check this one out

31:29.340 --> 31:31.340
it's titled one eight hundred
your dad

31:45.340 --> 31:47.340
a meaningful relationship

31:47.340 --> 31:49.340
press one if you call to chat

31:49.340 --> 31:51.340
press two if you call

31:51.340 --> 31:53.340
to apologize for not having

31:53.340 --> 31:55.340
phoned in months

31:55.340 --> 31:57.340
press three if you really called

31:57.340 --> 31:59.340
for money one

31:59.340 --> 32:01.340
you call to

32:01.340 --> 32:03.340
shoot the breeze press one

32:03.340 --> 32:05.340
if you want to hear about my
problems

32:05.340 --> 32:07.340
press two if you want

32:07.340 --> 32:09.340
us to hear about your problems

32:09.340 --> 32:11.340
or press three at any time

32:11.340 --> 32:13.340
if what you really called about

32:13.340 --> 32:15.340
was money

32:15.340 --> 32:17.340
come on one

32:17.340 --> 32:19.340
you want to hear about my
problems

32:19.340 --> 32:21.340
how thoughtful

32:21.340 --> 32:23.340
press one to hear what we think

32:23.340 --> 32:25.340
about your girlfriend Yolanda

32:25.340 --> 32:27.340
press two to hear

32:27.340 --> 32:29.340
what we think about your plan to
motorcycle

32:29.340 --> 32:31.340
around the world with your
barbarian

32:31.340 --> 32:33.340
friends on with them press three

32:33.340 --> 32:35.340
if what you really called about

32:35.340 --> 32:37.340
was money

32:37.340 --> 32:39.340
you finally press three

32:39.340 --> 32:41.340
please enter now the

32:41.340 --> 32:43.340
dollar amount you are requesting

32:43.340 --> 32:45.340
followed by the pound sign

32:45.340 --> 32:47.340
at the bottom of the dial

32:47.340 --> 32:49.340
one

32:49.340 --> 32:51.340
two

32:51.340 --> 32:53.340
the heck I won't get it anyway

32:53.340 --> 32:55.340
one

32:55.340 --> 32:57.340
pound sign

32:57.340 --> 32:59.340
five thousand

32:59.340 --> 33:01.340
dollars

33:01.340 --> 33:03.340
are you out of your mind

33:03.340 --> 33:05.340
press one to hear my lecture

33:05.340 --> 33:07.340
on how I am not far nuts

33:07.340 --> 33:09.340
press two to hear your mother

33:09.340 --> 33:11.340
weeping inconsolably about

33:11.340 --> 33:13.340
where she went wrong with you

33:13.340 --> 33:15.340
press three if you are willing

33:15.340 --> 33:17.340
to settle for one hundred
dollars cash

33:17.340 --> 33:19.340
no questions asked by return
mail

33:19.340 --> 33:21.340
hmm

33:21.340 --> 33:23.340
please hold your request is
being

33:23.340 --> 33:25.340
processed now

33:25.340 --> 33:27.340
near time

33:27.340 --> 33:29.340
dad

33:29.340 --> 33:31.340
get with it

33:31.340 --> 33:33.340
oh what a guy has got to do

33:33.340 --> 33:35.340
five hundred bucks

33:35.340 --> 33:37.340
hmm

33:37.340 --> 33:41.340
your request has just been

33:41.340 --> 33:43.340
electronically rooted to my bank

33:43.340 --> 33:45.340
thanks for calling and next time

33:45.340 --> 33:47.340
consider dropping by

33:47.340 --> 33:49.340
we really do miss you

33:49.340 --> 33:51.340
press one now to hear your
mother tell you

33:51.340 --> 33:53.340
she loves you too

33:53.340 --> 33:55.340
press two to hear duke bark hi

33:55.340 --> 33:57.340
or press three to hear your
little sister

33:57.340 --> 33:59.340
judy tell you

33:59.340 --> 34:01.340
we don't understand her either

34:01.340 --> 34:03.340
bye

34:03.340 --> 34:05.340
some choice

34:05.340 --> 34:07.340
dog

34:07.340 --> 34:09.340
hi duke

34:09.340 --> 34:11.340
dog's got to be eating

34:11.340 --> 34:13.340
there you go one eight hundred

34:13.340 --> 34:15.340
um

34:15.340 --> 34:17.340
your dad from WGBH

34:17.340 --> 34:19.340
and as soon as they get

34:19.340 --> 34:21.340
a feed together I will most
definitely point to it

34:21.340 --> 34:23.340
okay so there's still a little
bit of leaf

34:23.340 --> 34:25.340
blowing going on but

34:25.340 --> 34:27.340
you know maybe we'll make this a
double shot

34:27.340 --> 34:29.340
source code today

34:29.340 --> 34:31.340
playing a full hours

34:31.340 --> 34:33.340
worth of all the best that I've

34:33.340 --> 34:35.340
tripped across on the net

34:35.340 --> 34:37.340
let's listen to the Isles right
now

34:37.340 --> 34:39.340
who's that lady

34:41.250 --> 39:41.250
[ Music ]

39:48.260 --> 39:53.980
until the iTunes Music Store
comes to Europe, the European
Union, where it is end of
October,

39:53.980 --> 39:59.740
because then I can download and
happily pay for a good version
of the Isley Brothers, who

39:59.740 --> 40:00.740
is that lady?

40:00.740 --> 40:06.740
This had a dropout somewhere in
the middle there, you know, come
on people.

40:06.740 --> 40:11.620
Yeah, so I wonder how many of
you skipped ahead to this part
and didn't listen to the Isley

40:11.620 --> 40:12.620
Brothers?

40:12.620 --> 40:14.300
Does everyone always listen to
all the songs?

40:14.300 --> 40:16.380
Let me know, adamantcurry.com.

40:16.380 --> 40:19.020
So yeah, we're going to make
this a double shot of the source
code for today because

40:19.020 --> 40:28.260
there's just so much to talk
about, and what's the worst is
when great stuff happens on
Friday,

40:28.260 --> 40:31.460
and then I sit there all weekend
thinking, oh man, I got to talk
about this stuff.

40:31.460 --> 40:32.460
I don't remember what to talk
about.

40:32.460 --> 40:33.460
I'm writing stuff down.

40:33.460 --> 40:34.460
I've got outlines all over the
place.

40:34.460 --> 40:35.460
I've got bits, notes.

40:35.460 --> 40:39.180
I mean, I've never, I haven't
been this active since the first
time I hosted the

40:39.180 --> 40:41.620
morning show on Z100 in New
York.

40:41.620 --> 40:44.580
You know, I'm just totally,
everything is show prep mode,
which is great.

40:44.580 --> 40:48.980
I love it because I have so much
to talk about, and it's my
version of web-logging.

40:48.980 --> 40:51.100
On Friday, there was a new
Gilmore Gang that was put up.

40:51.100 --> 40:52.340
You know how much I love this
show?

40:52.340 --> 40:57.700
It's at itconversations.com, the
Gilmore Gang, Steve Gilmore,
John Udell, Doc Searls,

40:57.700 --> 41:01.020
and they always have some guests
on there.

41:01.020 --> 41:06.820
And I have to say, a lot of this
show was about iPodder, and I
mentioned this on Trade

41:06.820 --> 41:10.820
Secrets because Dave called up,
and so we might have said, well
shoot, we're talking

41:10.820 --> 41:14.460
and we want to talk about this
Gilmore Gang thing, and so we
recorded a show out

41:14.460 --> 41:19.500
of it and put it up, if you
haven't heard it,
secrets.scripting.com.

41:19.500 --> 41:28.140
And it was, you know, they kept
wandering away to talk about
suns, you know, buy computer

41:28.140 --> 41:34.420
cycles, buy the hour offering, I
actually posted a link to that
on my web-log, and

41:34.420 --> 41:38.500
they kept coming back to
iPodder, and it was great to
hear, you know, they were
clearly

41:38.500 --> 41:42.220
excited about it, and it was
wonderful to hear it, but there
were some errors in

41:42.260 --> 41:46.260
there that, you know, I was
listening, you have to
understand that, you know, if
you

41:46.260 --> 41:49.460
read a newspaper and you read an
interview, an article about
yourself, and

41:49.460 --> 41:52.820
there's something wrong, like,
oh man, shit. And then you see
it on TV, you know,

41:52.820 --> 41:56.620
sometimes you feel like throwing
the remote, and you hear stuff
on radio or

41:56.620 --> 41:59.860
your iPod, and I'm like, I'm
jumping up and down, like, no,
that's not right,

41:59.860 --> 42:04.420
that's not right. So I did get
some interesting points wrong,
and I was

42:04.420 --> 42:09.660
thinking about, you know,
playing back the show, stopping
it, and talking

42:09.660 --> 42:14.700
about, you know, exactly what
they said, but I didn't have to,
because Saturday

42:14.700 --> 42:18.740
morning on my iPod, waiting for
me, was a new evil genius
Chronicles, Dave Slusher

42:18.740 --> 42:24.260
had done exactly that, he did it
in post-production, in edit, but
I figured,

42:24.260 --> 42:27.820
I'll just play you a little bit,
a clip, and then the response
that Dave gives

42:27.820 --> 42:31.940
to that clip, because his
response is, it's just
excellent, it was, it just

42:31.940 --> 42:36.380
really cracked me up. So this is
a bit of the evil genius
Chronicles from

42:36.380 --> 42:41.820
September 25th, 2004, regarding
the Gilmore gang of the same
date.

42:41.820 --> 42:47.340
Well there's an optional
portion, effectively, of RSS
called Enclosures,

42:47.340 --> 42:50.620
that bear the greatest
similarity to email attachment.

42:50.620 --> 42:53.260
Hold on a second, you know what
I should do, I should probably
rewind this just a

42:53.260 --> 42:57.220
little bit, just so that you can
hear Dave's intro and who's
talking here,

42:57.220 --> 42:59.100
hold on a second.

42:59.100 --> 43:01.620
And, I'll rewind this.

43:01.980 --> 43:05.500
Here's what he had to say about
it.

43:05.500 --> 43:10.420
Okay, hold on, we're almost
there.

43:10.420 --> 43:12.540
It's also actually important,
okay.

43:12.540 --> 43:20.260
Okay, I'll play, because he also
does a mea culpa here, which is
important for context.

43:20.260 --> 43:24.140
You and I are hearing this at
different times, and I wrote
down everything I wanted to say,

43:24.140 --> 43:28.140
so hopefully I'm not
misremembering as I do this.

43:28.140 --> 43:32.740
But we're going to hear the
first piece, and this is Scott
Rafer from who's the CEO

43:32.740 --> 43:35.260
of Feedster. Here's what he had
to say about it.

43:35.260 --> 43:40.260
Well there's an optional
portion, effectively, of RSS
called Enclosures,

43:40.260 --> 43:45.540
that bear the greatest
similarity to email attachments,
than anything else.

43:45.540 --> 43:52.140
And with the restriction, you
can only have one per RSS entry.

43:52.140 --> 44:00.220
And, they've been gaining
popularity recently, and Adam
Curry, the former VH1

44:00.220 --> 44:05.620
VJ, who's now sort of done a lot
with RSS over from the
Netherlands,

44:05.620 --> 44:11.940
put together a piece of software
called iPodder, I-P-O-D-D-E-R
dot org,

44:11.940 --> 44:17.540
where you can go straight from
RSS enclosures onto your iPod.

44:17.540 --> 44:23.300
And he's got his little daily
radio show, you know, similar to
a certain extent.

44:23.300 --> 44:25.700
You know, to this one goes up
digital files on the web and
whatever.

44:25.700 --> 44:31.100
It's a soliloquy mainly. But he
put it out there and started
distributing

44:31.100 --> 44:35.460
his own radio show this way, and
listenership took off.

44:35.460 --> 44:39.780
And so they put out the piece of
software as a, you know,

44:39.780 --> 44:44.180
come one, come all kind of
little attachment to drop onto
your Mac.

44:44.220 --> 44:46.660
I don't believe there's a
Windows version yet.

44:46.660 --> 44:52.340
And what Scott Johnson did was
he reacted to this,

44:52.340 --> 44:57.420
and the growing popularity of
enclosures, putting together
some master feeds

44:57.420 --> 45:03.660
up on Feaster's site, so that
you can have an RSS feed of all
the MP3s

45:03.660 --> 45:07.420
that come through the system,
all the JPEGs, all the video
files,

45:07.420 --> 45:09.420
all the calendar events, even.

45:09.420 --> 45:12.660
So he had, you know, his
advocacy and, you know, his
company,

45:12.660 --> 45:15.660
obviously is supporting things
to help this platform out.

45:15.660 --> 45:19.380
A couple annoying little errors
in there, which as I posted
about this

45:19.380 --> 45:23.500
earlier in the weblog, I
ascribed him as working for
Technorati.

45:23.500 --> 45:26.460
So I make the annoying little
errors myself, too.

45:26.460 --> 45:28.180
I don't think Adam ever worked
for VH1.

45:28.180 --> 45:29.780
It was, I think, only MTV.

45:29.780 --> 45:31.140
Right, right, right. That's not
a biggie.

45:31.140 --> 45:34.460
No, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, hold
on, hold on, hold on.

45:34.460 --> 45:35.740
To me, that is a biggie.

45:38.860 --> 45:41.380
I used to host Headbangers Ball,
dude.

45:41.420 --> 45:45.620
I mean, it's like, oh, man,
that's so rough.

45:45.620 --> 45:50.420
The only real VJ that was ever
on VH1, besides Rosie O'Donnell,

45:50.420 --> 45:53.220
by the way, and I did her
audition,

45:53.220 --> 45:58.340
and she got hired because of me,
was Tim Bird, the Bird Mom.

45:58.340 --> 46:00.620
You're probably still here to
see him somewhere

46:00.620 --> 46:03.020
around your media market, Rodale
Station,

46:03.020 --> 46:05.180
Tim Bird, the Bird Mom.

46:05.180 --> 46:08.220
So no, that's actually quite
insulting to say that I

46:08.220 --> 46:09.140
was from VH1.

46:09.140 --> 46:10.620
And I was jumping up and down
when

46:10.660 --> 46:13.980
I heard that, I'm like, oh, come
on, man, that's unfair.

46:13.980 --> 46:16.420
But of course, maybe that's
because MTV no longer

46:16.420 --> 46:18.980
actually plays music videos and
VH1 does,

46:18.980 --> 46:21.260
so it may just be a very honest
mistake.

46:21.260 --> 46:24.220
Let's continue now with Dave
Slush's analysis

46:24.220 --> 46:25.500
of this statement.

46:25.500 --> 46:28.340
This isn't really an error, but
something about the way

46:28.340 --> 46:30.980
he said stuff kind of rubbed me
the wrong way.

46:30.980 --> 46:33.820
You notice that he uses the word
little like three times.

46:33.820 --> 46:36.180
Adam's little radio show and
this little program

46:36.180 --> 46:38.860
that you put on there and it
runs on its little subscription.

46:38.860 --> 46:41.780
To me, I don't know, it just
sounds like

46:41.780 --> 46:46.780
derogation and kind of
diminution of what we're doing
here.

46:48.220 --> 46:52.020
I mean, it's not something to be
so thin skin

46:52.020 --> 46:53.580
that bothers you about, but I
don't know why

46:53.580 --> 46:55.700
he's using that adjective to
describe this.

46:55.700 --> 46:57.100
Dave, I think I can tell you
why,

46:57.100 --> 46:59.460
because people who talk like
that,

46:59.460 --> 47:00.980
and I listen, I caught that as
well.

47:00.980 --> 47:03.900
I was like, whoa, man, why is he
saying little this

47:03.900 --> 47:08.260
and little that, and usually
people who say that

47:08.940 --> 47:11.420
it's a psychological thing, and
of course,

47:11.420 --> 47:13.780
everything you say is always
based upon your own psyche

47:13.780 --> 47:17.020
and your own frustration, so it
probably has a small penis.

47:17.020 --> 47:18.900
Stuff, it seems kind of out of
place.

47:18.900 --> 47:21.660
As does soliloquy, because it
sounds almost,

47:22.980 --> 47:24.420
I don't know, accusatory.

47:24.420 --> 47:27.080
Like, Adam's show is a
soliloquy,

47:27.080 --> 47:30.060
and guess what, this shows a
soliloquy, too.

47:30.060 --> 47:33.460
Is that, I mean, any one person
radio,

47:33.460 --> 47:35.260
talk radio show is like that,
you know?

47:36.220 --> 47:39.500
And I replayed that bit four
times,

47:39.500 --> 47:41.860
like what does he say, I
couldn't understand it,

47:41.860 --> 47:44.940
and it wasn't until I heard
Dave's analysis

47:44.940 --> 47:48.620
that I heard it was soliloquy,
and I had to look it up.

47:48.620 --> 47:51.260
I had to look it up on
dictionary.com.

47:51.260 --> 47:53.100
Hold on a second, let me bring
up

47:53.100 --> 47:54.620
the definition of soliloquy.

47:54.620 --> 47:57.740
I think I posted to my web log
about that as well.

47:58.980 --> 48:01.980
Hold on a second, let's just get
that.

48:01.980 --> 48:04.420
Soliloquy, it's even hard to
say.

48:04.460 --> 48:08.020
Soliloquy, damn, it's the word
of the day.

48:08.020 --> 48:10.260
Soliloquy, let me see.

48:12.380 --> 48:14.620
Where is it, where, here,
soliloquy.

48:16.220 --> 48:18.740
A dramatic or literary form of
discourse

48:18.740 --> 48:21.900
in which a character talks to
himself or herself

48:21.900 --> 48:23.740
or reveals his or her thoughts

48:23.740 --> 48:26.300
without addressing a listener.

48:27.420 --> 48:29.620
That's not true, that's just not
true.

48:29.620 --> 48:32.860
I'm totally 100% addressing
listeners here.

48:33.060 --> 48:34.460
And the only reason I'm stopping
by,

48:34.460 --> 48:36.260
and I'm just making light of the
situation,

48:36.260 --> 48:38.980
I'm tickled to death that these
guys talked about it,

48:38.980 --> 48:41.980
really am, and I'm so happy that
Feedster is supporting us.

48:43.140 --> 48:45.740
But shit, I got a whole hour to
fill here, you know what I'm
saying?

48:45.740 --> 48:48.220
Let's just see if Dave has
anything left here.

48:48.220 --> 48:50.260
Any talk radio show in the
period

48:50.260 --> 48:52.980
between they're taking calls,
that's a soliloquy.

48:52.980 --> 48:55.460
That's just the way it goes,
why?

48:55.460 --> 48:59.380
So, but it is interesting that
Feedster is behind this.

48:59.380 --> 49:01.740
I don't know that I would ever
use a Feedster feed

49:01.740 --> 49:03.940
to aggregate for the same
reason, you know,

49:03.940 --> 49:04.780
when we were going around.

49:04.780 --> 49:06.300
All right, so that's a whole
different conversation.

49:06.300 --> 49:08.100
You should listen to Dave's show

49:08.100 --> 49:10.100
if you wanna check out all of
that.

49:10.100 --> 49:12.020
But anyway, it's a hilarious
analysis

49:12.020 --> 49:14.300
of that conversation on the
Gilmore Gang,

49:14.300 --> 49:16.060
which is still one of my
favorite shows.

49:16.060 --> 49:19.660
So, just saying howdy guys,
we're listening to you.

49:19.660 --> 49:21.580
I don't miss one of your shows
either.

49:21.580 --> 49:24.700
In fact, I'm really upset when I
miss one of your shows.

49:24.700 --> 49:27.900
Let me see, what else do we have
left?

49:27.900 --> 49:32.900
Well, I ran across an
interesting podcast.

49:33.500 --> 49:35.300
Let me just see, look at the
metadata here.

49:35.300 --> 49:37.060
This is from Peter Overbaker.

49:37.060 --> 49:39.100
It's called Ghost in the
Machine.

49:39.100 --> 49:42.780
And well, you should just listen
to it for yourself

49:42.780 --> 49:44.940
and you'll understand what he's
doing immediately.

49:44.940 --> 49:47.860
I've taken off the first bit of
the theme song

49:47.860 --> 49:51.300
and it almost goes straight into
the actual

49:51.300 --> 49:52.660
start of the podcast.

49:53.580 --> 49:56.620
Ghost in the Machine audio blog

49:56.620 --> 50:00.540
for Sunday, September 26th,
2004.

50:00.540 --> 50:03.860
Hi, all welcome to my very first
audio blog,

50:03.860 --> 50:07.420
read to you by ReadPlease 2003.

50:07.420 --> 50:09.300
Because my own voice sucks,

50:09.300 --> 50:12.540
I thought this might be a fun
solution.

50:12.540 --> 50:14.980
Well, it might not be as
successful

50:14.980 --> 50:16.780
as Adam's or Dave's show.

50:16.780 --> 50:18.900
Okay, well, anyway, I'll shoot
now.

50:18.900 --> 50:21.020
There's Luke again with the leaf
blower.

50:21.020 --> 50:24.660
So clearly, you're not gonna
listen to a voice like that

50:24.660 --> 50:26.620
for very long, but I have to say
this,

50:26.620 --> 50:28.900
and this can't be Apple speech
synthesis

50:28.900 --> 50:30.060
that's built into OS X

50:30.060 --> 50:31.460
because it doesn't sound that
good.

50:31.460 --> 50:35.420
I don't think, maybe it is, but
Peter should let us know.

50:35.420 --> 50:38.180
But it does seem like it could
be appropriate.

50:38.180 --> 50:39.740
If I have a playlist of stuff

50:39.740 --> 50:41.540
that I wanna listen to in the
morning,

50:41.540 --> 50:44.020
which includes a local weather
report,

50:44.020 --> 50:47.220
it includes a sports update,
unlikely, right?

50:47.220 --> 50:49.900
Okay, so let's take a political
update.

50:49.900 --> 50:51.780
Then I wanna listen to a show

50:51.780 --> 50:53.860
that plays two new songs for the
day,

50:53.860 --> 50:55.220
and then maybe there's something
else

50:55.220 --> 50:57.620
that's totally automated that
someone doesn't feel

50:57.620 --> 51:02.380
like setting up, like doing a
voice track

51:02.380 --> 51:03.220
every single day.

51:03.220 --> 51:04.300
You could automate that with
text.

51:04.300 --> 51:06.260
I mean, even maybe the weather
report is like that.

51:06.260 --> 51:07.660
I think it'd be pretty boring,

51:07.660 --> 51:09.860
but I think it's certainly
useful.

51:09.860 --> 51:11.860
I think there's a spot for it

51:11.860 --> 51:13.300
in everything that we're doing.

51:13.300 --> 51:17.380
And again, this could be used
for so many things.

51:17.380 --> 51:18.580
Just look at the telephone.

51:18.580 --> 51:21.180
Look at a weblog and say what
can this be used

51:21.180 --> 51:22.020
to make money?

51:22.020 --> 51:24.020
How can I use this to make
money?

51:24.020 --> 51:24.980
And forget the weblog.

51:24.980 --> 51:26.180
Look at a telephone.

51:26.180 --> 51:27.020
You know, it's the same thing.

51:27.020 --> 51:29.980
And just think about what we're
doing with radio.

51:29.980 --> 51:31.460
We're doing too radio.

51:31.460 --> 51:34.140
I mean, the spot where radio
makes its money

51:34.140 --> 51:37.140
is during drive time, in the
morning and the afternoon.

51:37.140 --> 51:40.700
And it's a very different way of
consuming information

51:40.700 --> 51:43.420
because you're not going
anywhere physically.

51:43.420 --> 51:45.020
I mean, sure, you're moving
along the road.

51:45.020 --> 51:46.300
Hopefully, maybe you're in
traffic.

51:46.300 --> 51:47.180
You're moving along slowly,

51:47.180 --> 51:48.620
you're not getting out of your
car.

51:48.620 --> 51:49.980
And besides the cell phone,

51:49.980 --> 51:54.260
there's not much else to do in
the way of entertainment.

51:54.260 --> 51:56.620
And so you're kind of stuck
there.

51:56.620 --> 51:58.260
And the most entertaining thing
for you

51:58.260 --> 52:00.420
will keep you going, and you're
going to get marketed to.

52:00.420 --> 52:02.620
And there's money there.

52:02.620 --> 52:05.220
There's money to be made.

52:05.220 --> 52:07.460
And we're totally competing with
that market.

52:07.460 --> 52:08.780
And I tell you, look out.

52:08.780 --> 52:09.980
Look out.

52:09.980 --> 52:13.780
Because the NAB is one powerful
organization,

52:13.780 --> 52:16.220
10 times more, maybe 100 times
more powerful

52:16.260 --> 52:17.780
than the RIAA.

52:17.780 --> 52:19.820
And once they, that's the record
lobby,

52:19.820 --> 52:22.420
once they know what we're up to,

52:22.420 --> 52:24.820
it's going to get really, really
interesting.

52:24.820 --> 52:27.100
And they have it, they brought
it upon themselves.

52:27.100 --> 52:28.540
They've made radio boring.

52:28.540 --> 52:32.140
Clear Channel owns so many radio
stations.

52:32.140 --> 52:34.100
And it's just, it's boring.

52:34.100 --> 52:35.340
It's the same playlist.

52:35.340 --> 52:37.380
It's the same cookie cutter
stuff.

52:37.380 --> 52:41.020
It's not about the emotion of
communicating stuff anymore.

52:41.020 --> 52:42.580
It's just about making money,

52:42.580 --> 52:44.820
which is the same for the music
business.

52:44.820 --> 52:46.340
And I think that's what we're
all about.

52:46.340 --> 52:48.220
Damn, I'm already doing my
blogger con thing.

52:48.220 --> 52:49.060
I got to stop this.

52:49.060 --> 52:52.180
Okay, let me play you a bit from
another show that I found,

52:52.180 --> 52:53.260
who I contacted and said,

52:53.260 --> 52:55.180
please, please, please, please
make this

52:55.180 --> 52:57.900
into a podcast compatible feed,

52:57.900 --> 53:00.260
RSS 2.0 with enclosures.

53:00.260 --> 53:01.100
They got back to me and said,

53:01.100 --> 53:02.420
sure, they're definitely going
to do that.

53:02.420 --> 53:04.220
It's the Link Linux show.

53:05.300 --> 53:08.100
And I've never heard this
before.

53:08.100 --> 53:10.020
I think this is their 50th
anniversary show,

53:10.020 --> 53:12.820
or it's around their 50th
episode, maybe even more.

53:12.820 --> 53:13.860
But it's really cool.

53:13.860 --> 53:15.900
It's just a couple of guys
talking geek talk,

53:15.900 --> 53:18.540
just like Dave and I might do.

53:18.540 --> 53:21.220
And they also chatted about
iPodder.

53:21.220 --> 53:22.660
From a geek perspective,

53:22.660 --> 53:25.380
I'll just play a little bit of
this just to point it out.

53:25.380 --> 53:28.540
And I'll let you know as soon as
they have their iPodder

53:28.540 --> 53:30.020
feed up and ready to go.

53:30.020 --> 53:31.620
Here's a little bit from the
Link Linux show.

53:31.620 --> 53:33.740
This is from two weeks ago.

53:33.740 --> 53:35.100
Pods, what?

53:35.100 --> 53:37.100
Dan's shiny iPod there.

53:37.100 --> 53:39.460
I was playing with an
application last week

53:39.460 --> 53:42.460
called iPodder, excuse me.

53:43.860 --> 53:44.900
Let's find it here.

53:46.060 --> 53:50.980
It's iPodder, which allows you
to do audio downloads

53:50.980 --> 53:52.140
for like the audio blogs.

53:52.140 --> 53:54.260
I know you were listening to
some earlier

53:54.260 --> 53:55.620
a couple of months ago.

53:55.620 --> 54:00.620
Basically, it allows, you embed
it in your RSS.

54:01.220 --> 54:04.060
Honestly, every day or whenever
you put another audio feed

54:04.060 --> 54:06.860
up there on it, you get an
application

54:06.860 --> 54:08.100
which automatically downloads.

54:08.100 --> 54:09.460
Automatically downloads the
thing you're iPodder.

54:09.460 --> 54:10.300
If you have an iPodder,

54:10.300 --> 54:13.140
it'll actually store it on your
iPod for you.

54:13.140 --> 54:15.860
On that, I've obviously had them
work for me.

54:15.860 --> 54:17.700
But I don't have one.

54:17.700 --> 54:19.020
It doesn't work for me either.

54:19.020 --> 54:20.700
But it does put everything on
the disk

54:20.700 --> 54:22.780
and I can burn it off onto a CD

54:22.780 --> 54:24.820
to listen at work and whatever.

54:24.820 --> 54:26.300
It's pretty neat.

54:26.300 --> 54:28.660
If you go to iPodder.org,

54:28.660 --> 54:31.420
if you're into listening to what
other people have to say,

54:31.420 --> 54:33.900
obviously, could you listen to
our show

54:33.900 --> 54:35.300
and maybe have an interest in
that.

54:35.300 --> 54:37.300
Yeah, which, you know, that
brings up a good point.

54:37.300 --> 54:39.100
Like, there's...

54:39.100 --> 54:40.620
It's actually something we may
want to do

54:40.620 --> 54:44.180
with embedding some of this into
our tech show page.

54:44.180 --> 54:45.980
So isn't it great to hear the
difference

54:45.980 --> 54:48.980
between how users talk about
this

54:48.980 --> 54:50.540
and how techies talk about it?

54:51.420 --> 54:54.500
You know, we'll embed it into
the RSS of the show.

54:55.580 --> 54:56.660
Exactly.

54:56.660 --> 54:59.260
You know, iPodder is nothing
more

54:59.260 --> 55:01.140
than an iPod filling station.

55:01.140 --> 55:02.660
That's what it's all about.

55:03.620 --> 55:05.660
Just briefly, listening to those
past two clips.

55:05.660 --> 55:07.940
So there's actually this one big
thing

55:07.940 --> 55:10.140
that I really want to focus on.

55:10.140 --> 55:13.260
We need to get the Windows
version of iPodder

55:13.260 --> 55:14.540
kind of out there.

55:14.540 --> 55:16.700
We've got all kinds of scripts
that run on Windows.

55:16.700 --> 55:19.860
We've got the connection to the
Windows media player,

55:19.860 --> 55:22.940
which means we can connect to
all these devices

55:22.940 --> 55:24.980
that sync up to the media
player.

55:24.980 --> 55:27.620
And I know the work is going on.

55:27.620 --> 55:29.420
I just, you know, I can't wait.

55:29.420 --> 55:32.100
I'm so anxious to really give
this a go

55:32.100 --> 55:33.460
because right now it's being...

55:33.460 --> 55:35.500
And that's of course because I
started with Apple Script.

55:35.500 --> 55:37.900
It's kind of being deemed a Mac
only thing

55:37.940 --> 55:40.460
and the fact that it's also
being used with iPods.

55:40.460 --> 55:44.300
So, you know, now is the time to
see if we can move that

55:44.300 --> 55:45.860
and just let me know what I
could do to help.

55:45.860 --> 55:48.660
Unfortunately, I'm totally
useless

55:48.660 --> 55:51.820
when it comes to programming
anything for Windows

55:51.820 --> 55:52.660
or even using Windows.

55:52.660 --> 55:53.500
I know how to use it.

55:53.500 --> 55:54.900
I have Windows 2000 here.

55:54.900 --> 55:57.180
I'll gladly throw anything on
there to test it

55:57.180 --> 56:00.420
and try and beat it to shreds.

56:00.420 --> 56:01.980
But it's all it is.

56:01.980 --> 56:05.460
It's just the GUI in the setup
and the timed...

56:05.460 --> 56:06.820
Just look at iPod or X.

56:06.860 --> 56:08.940
That's exactly what it should
be.

56:08.940 --> 56:11.820
And then, you know, then I see
there's a whole market

56:11.820 --> 56:15.020
just waiting there for
developers

56:15.020 --> 56:20.020
to create special iPoders with
built to spec

56:20.900 --> 56:22.180
or special features.

56:22.180 --> 56:25.460
There's gonna be lots of people
looking for different ways

56:25.460 --> 56:27.580
to use the iPod or from the
academic field

56:27.580 --> 56:32.580
for lectures to the music
business.

56:33.140 --> 56:35.620
They're gonna, believe me,
they're gonna be shows

56:35.620 --> 56:38.060
that you'll have the Warner
Brothers music show.

56:38.060 --> 56:40.620
And it'll be total commercial
for Warner Brothers.

56:40.620 --> 56:41.460
But you know what?

56:41.460 --> 56:43.220
You're gonna get a show and
you're gonna get your music

56:43.220 --> 56:45.180
and it's gonna come to you
automatically.

56:45.180 --> 56:49.500
And I do believe in Ken
Ortowski's speech

56:49.500 --> 56:52.700
which I spoke about on Trade
Secrets

56:52.700 --> 56:57.060
and also on Daily Source Code,

56:57.060 --> 56:59.300
the music business is going to
start figuring out

56:59.300 --> 57:01.380
how to repackage music and sell
music.

57:01.380 --> 57:05.540
And they're going to treat the
iPod platform as radio

57:05.540 --> 57:07.980
and we're gonna get the same
benefits.

57:07.980 --> 57:10.940
We're gonna be able to use
unlimited amounts of music

57:10.940 --> 57:12.980
on the iPod platform.

57:12.980 --> 57:15.420
Of course, if we start making
money,

57:15.420 --> 57:19.260
then you're gonna have to pay
some of that in royalty fees

57:19.260 --> 57:23.300
and usually that's about 6% of
your gross revenue.

57:23.300 --> 57:25.860
No problem, no fucking problem.

57:25.860 --> 57:28.100
Cut me that deal.

57:28.100 --> 57:29.060
Cut me the deal today.

57:29.060 --> 57:30.820
I'll sign immediately.

57:30.820 --> 57:32.740
I'd like it to be 4%, but it's
okay.

57:32.740 --> 57:34.180
We'll go for six if you want.

57:34.940 --> 57:39.500
And 6% of zero is still zero at
the moment.

57:39.500 --> 57:40.860
But the minute I start making
money,

57:40.860 --> 57:44.260
as long as I can play unlimited
ASCAP BMI licensed music,

57:44.260 --> 57:45.300
you better believe it.

57:45.300 --> 57:47.020
You better believe it all over
that.

57:47.020 --> 57:49.420
And it will make you more money

57:49.420 --> 57:52.460
if you're in the record selling
business.

57:52.460 --> 57:55.220
Of course, I doubt that record
companies will,

57:55.220 --> 57:56.300
well, some will get desperate

57:56.300 --> 57:57.620
and some are small enough to do
it,

57:57.620 --> 57:58.820
but I think that we're just
gonna see

57:58.820 --> 58:00.500
new companies springing up,

58:00.500 --> 58:03.140
grabbing this opportunity with
both hands

58:03.140 --> 58:05.700
and all the rest is in there.

58:05.700 --> 58:10.180
We'll gladly use iTunes Music
Store for the one-off sales,

58:10.180 --> 58:12.380
but there's so much more to be
done in packaging

58:12.380 --> 58:15.580
with the multimedia capabilities
that we have today.

58:16.860 --> 58:19.700
One more note, final closing
thought

58:19.700 --> 58:21.460
as we roll up on the full hour

58:21.460 --> 58:23.460
of the Daily Source Code for
this Monday

58:23.460 --> 58:26.380
is for Dave Slusher who threw a
question out there

58:26.380 --> 58:27.740
on Friday.

58:27.740 --> 58:30.620
It's not a convenient day for me
certainly to respond

58:30.620 --> 58:32.500
because I don't tape until
Monday,

58:32.500 --> 58:36.860
but I did remember to mention
this.

58:36.860 --> 58:37.700
He says, well, you know,

58:37.700 --> 58:40.940
someone offered to put
advertisements on his weblog

58:40.940 --> 58:42.540
and pay him for it and he's
saying,

58:42.540 --> 58:44.100
well, let's say that they're on
the up and up,

58:44.100 --> 58:45.620
you know, what should I do?

58:45.620 --> 58:48.220
Should I only take
advertisements for stuff

58:48.220 --> 58:53.220
that I believe in for products
that I believe in

58:53.980 --> 58:57.060
or should I just take the money
and, you know,

58:57.060 --> 58:58.980
let it be that?

58:58.980 --> 59:02.380
You know, these are really,
really hard questions.

59:02.380 --> 59:04.060
And it depends on what kind of
content

59:04.060 --> 59:05.940
or what kind of show you're
putting together.

59:05.940 --> 59:08.260
When it comes to a show like
this,

59:08.260 --> 59:10.580
I'll gladly tell you, but all
the products that I love

59:10.580 --> 59:13.020
and that I use and I'm happy
that those people

59:13.020 --> 59:15.980
will benefit from that
endorsement.

59:17.460 --> 59:21.780
If I were to get paid for it,

59:21.780 --> 59:23.500
you know, I'd have to let you
know about it.

59:23.500 --> 59:26.580
And I think that that's fair and
everyone understands

59:26.580 --> 59:29.740
that there's time and money
involved in production.

59:30.420 --> 59:32.860
I think everyone understands
that, you know,

59:32.860 --> 59:35.620
every chimney has to be a
smoking.

59:35.620 --> 59:38.100
So I don't think there's a
problem there.

59:38.100 --> 59:40.780
But let me just give you my two
rules of business,

59:40.780 --> 59:44.260
which I have actually borrowed
from a former partner of mine.

59:46.380 --> 59:49.420
Rule number one, don't negotiate
against yourself

59:49.420 --> 59:50.340
because that's what you're
doing.

59:50.340 --> 59:51.900
Now, granted, you put it out
there for us,

59:51.900 --> 59:53.980
but don't negotiate against
yourself.

59:53.980 --> 59:56.060
And then number two,

59:56.060 --> 59:58.220
if there's something you just
really don't feel like doing,

59:58.220 --> 59:59.860
then indeed, raise the price

59:59.860 --> 01:00:02.100
because it will eventually
become attractive.

01:00:02.100 --> 01:00:04.860
And that's it for the source
code for today.

01:00:04.860 --> 01:00:07.140
Monday, the 27th of September,
2004.

01:00:07.140 --> 01:00:07.980
I'm Adam Curry.

01:00:07.980 --> 01:00:09.500
I am out of here.

01:00:09.500 --> 01:00:10.660
Thanks for listening.

01:00:10.660 --> 01:00:12.660
Power of your intelligence.

01:00:16.100 --> 01:00:17.940
And as always, if you want to
respond,

01:00:17.940 --> 01:00:19.940
send me an email to adam at
curry.com

01:00:19.940 --> 01:00:23.540
or leave a comment on my weblog,
live.curry.com.

01:00:23.540 --> 01:00:25.940
Check out the archives of the
daily source code

01:00:25.940 --> 01:00:27.380
at dailysourcecode.com.

01:00:27.420 --> 01:00:29.300
You can also pick up the podcast
or feed.

01:00:29.300 --> 01:00:30.140
I'll see you tomorrow.

01:00:30.140 --> 01:00:30.980
Bye-bye.

01:00:30.980 --> 01:00:33.820
The power of your intelligence.

01:00:33.820 --> 01:00:36.820
The power of your intelligence.
